PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Chi-town blues]

Not sure City could sue the pl because in effect you are suing yourself as you belong to the organisation you are suing !

Well vice versa same logic applies the other way round at least in theory but look where we are now?

 

[Blue_Lightsaber]

If this timeline Is true, if the Premier League have a case and if City have “irrefutable evidence of our innocence” why is it taking so long to have a hearing ?

It's likely to go like the Leipzig game.. first half PL lawyers tip the scales and looks like we're guilty. second half City comeback.

If we don't concede more goals that is!

But they're really mad at us.
The Rags are mad we have our own treble.
The Dips are mad we stole Istanbul from em.
Gooners are mad we haven't let em win last year.
Levy is mad we didn't pay for Kane like we did for Walker.

Now two more years of Guilty in the media for sure!

Wish we'd sue those 4 fuckers and the PL for damages!

 

[Iassel]

Sue them to death City

Sue who for what?

Even in the absolute best case scenario that this is all a wild goose chase, trying to rehash the UEFA case, the fact still remains that City could’ve put this to bed at any time in the past 5 years, rather than clam up on legal advice and refuse to respond to the PL’s fishing trips.

No court in the world is going to rule jn your favour for something you could’ve actively prevented.

 

[Chi-town blues]

It's likely to go like the Leipzig game.. first half PL lawyers tip the scales and looks like we're guilty. second half City comeback.

If we don't concede more goals that its!

Slight difference, by that time kdb will be fit .

 

[spinney]

Sue who for what?

Even in the absolute best case scenario that this is all a wild goose chase, trying to rehash the UEFA case, the fact still remains that City could’ve put this to bed at any time in the past 5 years, rather than clam up on legal advice and refuse to respond to the PL’s fishing trips.

No court in the world is going to rule jn your favour for something you could’ve actively prevented.

City haven't prevented anything , the enquiries have taken so long because their is so little for them to find

 

[Inter Me Nan]

During his first etihad tour he went straight to check the length of the grass.

I thought you meant because he always had red eye!

 

[OntarioBlue]

Slight difference, by that time kdb will be fit .

By the time the hearing actually happens KDB could be retired !

 

[Chi-town blues]

I thought you meant because he always had red eye!

hahaha

 

[blueparrot]

Sue who for what?

Even in the absolute best case scenario that this is all a wild goose chase, trying to rehash the UEFA case, the fact still remains that City could’ve put this to bed at any time in the past 5 years, rather than clam up on legal advice and refuse to respond to the PL’s fishing trips.

No court in the world is going to rule jn your favour for something you could’ve actively prevented.

What did they refuse to respond to ?

 

[CC1]

Sue who for what?

Even in the absolute best case scenario that this is all a wild goose chase, trying to rehash the UEFA case, the fact still remains that City could’ve put this to bed at any time in the past 5 years, rather than clam up on legal advice and refuse to respond to the PL’s fishing trips.

No court in the world is going to rule jn your favour for something you could’ve actively prevented.

So, when did you discuss this with Khaldoon? Lucky you to be privy to such important information.