PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

No one has answered me about this point so here goes:
Can someone tell me why the charges go back to 2009 when PL FFP came into force in 2014?
Is it trying to blacken our character so other lesser charges can be seen in a worse light?
Our charges are nothing to do with the PL's Profit & Sustainability Rules. They are to do with wider PL Rules about reporting true and fair accounts and acting in good faith.
 
Everton's appeal outcome will be interesting. The PL made up the sanctions rule after Everton had been charged first time around. The points deduction they have received feels very harsh. If the 10 point deduction still stands post Everton's appeal I wonder what the tribunal will apply to us if we are found guilty of some of the charges. The PL will have set a very dangerous precedent for future cases. Everton need to get their points deduction quashed. Everton should have received a financial penalty in my view due to the size of their breach. What a shambles Richard Masters!
 
So now your back to organisations setting specific rules that don't apply in law. The law doesn't state the maximum you can pay an employee is "x" but other sporting organisations have such rules.
As I said to you earlier, we agreed to abide by the rules of FFP we can't now challenge them.
We can challenge FFP/PSR, but we've chosen not to be the ones to bring it all crashing down.

Just because I agreed to join Need For Speed road racing club, doesn't mean the 70mph national speed limit doesn't apply in Law.

You can't exceed 70mph regardless of club rules, likewise we can't legally be stopped from investing what we like in our squad because of FFP/PSR.

The fact we've agreed to FFP/PSR means little in the big scheme of things in UK Law, otherwise the old bill would've long since felt Khaldoon's collar for allegedly spending too much on his employer's business.
 
Telegraph article today on its back page… Judgement day looms for City ! Article could have been written by a 5 year old…. Basically says a date has been set but interestingly says the club should be made aware before it’s announced publicly…. But we all know it’ll leak to the media before either the club are informed or it’s officially announced.
 
We can challenge FFP/PSR, but we've chosen not to be the ones to bring it all crashing down.

Just because I agreed to join Need For Speed road racing club, doesn't mean the 70mph national speed limit doesn't apply in Law.

You can't exceed 70mph regardless of club rules, likewise we can't legally be stopped from investing what we like in our squad because of FFP/PSR.

The fact we've agreed to FFP/PSR means little in the big scheme of things in UK Law, otherwise the old bill would've long since felt Khaldoon's collar for allegedly spending too much on his employer's business.
Also our charges don't actually relate to FFP, they relate to inaccurate accounting which is something that exists in UK law.
 
Also our charges don't actually relate to FFP, they relate to inaccurate accounting which is something that exists in UK law.
Exactly, so if we're being accused of inaccurate accounting, doesn't that amount to fraud?

If so, why haven't UEFA or the PL ever levelled that term at us, & called in the Plod?
 
Last edited:
Telegraph article today on its back page… Judgement day looms for City ! Article could have been written by a 5 year old…. Basically says a date has been set but interestingly says the club should be made aware before it’s announced publicly…. But we all know it’ll leak to the media before either the club are informed or it’s officially announced.

Laughable isn’t it. Mike Keegan reported this in October.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.