YCNMIU
Is the **** still blocking anyone who tries to reply?
YCNMIU
YCNMIU
YCNMIU
Still not making sense. How does is going into administration give them legal billsAll the clubs would be left with their own legal costs, it would affect their return. A lot of the US clubs are owned by hedge funds.
It wouldn’t affect them any more but I just thought I’d pick them….
Surely that must leave the fella open to legal action?"Criminal acts"
wow! what a claim to make.
Whoever signed it off, I doubt any of them had any objections.Agree. But who signed it off at Old Trafford. Glazers, Gill or Jim.?
Like not taking our library books back in time?"Criminal acts"
wow! what a claim to make.
Still not making sense. How does is going into administration give them legal bills
Let it go pal…..
It was a silly joke that you have misunderstood.
I did cover this topic last week on Talksport around here
Take this to privet messages, please.
Sorry I am cursed like that.Hedge funds. Privet messages.
Very good :)
the fact that tottenham are in on it shows you how laughable it is, tottenham claiming compensation is like your mate dave claiming compensation from max verstappen for stopping him winning a grand prix.For anyone interested:
View attachment 138144
The only thing dragging on is Ziegler flogging this dead horse ......
At least we "know" now the compensation claims in respect of Everyone's first punishment were withdrawn, with the exception of Burnley whose claim is still in process.
No need to take offence.Take this to privet messages, please.
I see no reason why it would only be those four. Suspect those 4 have so far had one barrister which is where the story is from but that wouldn't necessarily mean that was the limit. Until we know what the judgment says, no club would rule out legal action and so therefore would need to rule it in because, as I have always said, English law statute of limitations applies to the PL rules.Interesting that. Thanks for posting.
Would you update it following Ziegler's piece this week? Only four clubs seeking compensation, or do you still think it may be more?
I think if they go down the legal action route, with claim and counterclaim they are going to get what they always wanted which is the destruction of pl and the esl.I see no reason why it would only be those four. Suspect those 4 have so far had one barrister which is where the story is from but that wouldn't necessarily mean that was the limit. Until we know what the judgment says, no club would rule out legal action and so therefore would need to rule it in because, as I have always said, English law statute of limitations applies to the PL rules.
They can only sue if we are guilty of fraud, and if we are guilty of fraud, limitation is suspended. So why the need to reserve the right to claim damages?I see no reason why it would only be those four. Suspect those 4 have so far had one barrister which is where the story is from but that wouldn't necessarily mean that was the limit. Until we know what the judgment says, no club would rule out legal action and so therefore would need to rule it in because, as I have always said, English law statute of limitations applies to the PL rules.