Pricks like Harris and his Associated Press clowns are a pain in the neck but don't understand how many blues get their knickers in a twist by him and the likes of Simon Jordon !
Then our disgraced owners could buy United and the celebrating media could circle jerk themselves into a frenzyOur ownership would have to sell IF we were guilty, they simply would have no option and as a club we would be damaged in a major way, probably relegated several divisions.
But as said before IF, and why on earth would our execs commit fraud in what I said earlier is a small investment model by our owners standard.
Because they are laying the groundwork for giving us a reputation that will never go away for cheating and cooking the books whilst their beaus continue to cheat and cook the books and get praised for it?
Why wouldn't blues get pissed off about that?
I love him and his enthusiasm but his guests make his podcast unlistenable. (The fans I mean, not the ex players)Isn’t it great being a blue.
It's a tricky one.I highly doubt that there is anyone on here who could go on a show like that and not say something that could be twisted in a different way.
Stefan was doing exactly what he should have done, in giving a fair and impartial as possible explanation of the situation from a legal point view
Some of them make it unwatchable! ;-)I love him and his enthusiasm but his guests make his podcast unlistenable. (The fans I mean, not the ex players)
The Rusholme Rum’un actually mate.The Fallowfield Flasher, I presume!
Can I nick that for tonight ? My local is a haven of Scousers.Whenever a scouser moans about City I start my response by asking "What's wrong with a wealthy benefactor coming into a second division club, outspending the opposition and turning a struggling club into a top English and European team?".
This is usually met with "it's just wrong" and a plethora of "no history" and City bingo phrases.
I then explain that I was actually talking about their club and if it was okay for them, what's wrong with someone doing the same thing with a club that had finished in the top half of the Premier League the season before. Usually don't have much to say after.
let me ask you a question if someone on here thinks you're a **** does it bother you?Because they are laying the groundwork for giving us a reputation that will never go away for cheating and cooking the books whilst their beaus continue to cheat and cook the books and get praised for it?
Why wouldn't blues get pissed off about that?
I personally don't see it that way. I see it as 'journalists' exploiting the emotions of fans of other clubs being so desperate for us to be guilty as a reason to explain why they haven't won anything for years in a bid to attract clicks. The reputations of the 'journalists' who constantly mislead the public with their bullshit would be damaged far more than ours when the charges can't be proven. The athletic might even start offering their piss poor fanzine to people for as little as 1p a year.Because they are laying the groundwork for giving us a reputation that will never go away for cheating and cooking the books whilst their beaus continue to cheat and cook the books and get praised for it?
Why wouldn't blues get pissed off about that?