Mcfc1.9.8.0
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2023
- Messages
- 678
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Can we now plead guilty to all 115 charges and say it was all down to Berreda they same way Chelsea are pinning it all on Abramovic
Unless I'm missing something, is it not suspicious how Harris has obtained a copy on an internal e:mail ?
I prefer not to use an apostrophe for plurals.I believe both spelling s are acceptable. I prefer to say tennis bat
If there’s no fraud or attempt to mislead the limitation period is 6 yearsSorry - I didn't realise it was you I was replying to. The point I was (somewhat longwindedly) trying to make was that we could still be found to have breached some of the 115 charges, but not acted fraudulently or in an attempt to mislead. So maybe acted within the letter of the law but not the spirit.
I am not sure many or any are suggesting otherwise. But let's acknowledge that it is a very black or white view based on an ultimate all or nothing verdict.
There could I would assume be greys or different extents there though, with outcomes reflective of that.
It was part of the Der Spiegel hack I think. Or was produced at another hearing specifically related to the issue of youth players, where we received a two-year ban on signing young players. Harris is a fantasist who likes to pretend he's getting information from club insiders. He quoted me as a 'club insider' once.I thought the same. Clearly got a few of the bitter ex staff leaking shit, as I suspect the Premier League have.
Snakey bastards
He has been to planet gilf plenty of times.
Rooney time:
Grass ;)It was part of the Der Spiegel hack I think. Or was produced at another hearing specifically related to the issue of youth players, where we received a two-year ban on signing young players. Harris is a fantasist who likes to pretend he's getting information from club insiders. He quoted me as a 'club insider' once.