2infinity&beyond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 591
Lets face it. It comes down to who has the best lawyers. I would back Sheik Monseur.
There are certainly wider ramifications at stake than just sticking it to City.
Humiliating Abu Dhabi is not a wise move.
They will come for the things these wankers love the most.
How are we going to quash or overturn over 100 charges though, no matter how good the lawyers are?Lets face it. It comes down to who has the best lawyers. I would back Sheik Monseur.
Exactly. Nothing to worry about. I am more concerned with the fact we didn’t sign a LB in the window.Lets face it. It comes down to who has the best lawyers. I would back Sheik Monseur.
Fernandinho listening to the Twitter space on the matter is great. Still got a vested interest in the club
Had something recently on a smaller scale with my current employer over something contractual.I have a legal case with my ex employer where some of the accusations put to me in a public forum were factually incorrect. However, because of their bias & blind spots they never hesitated. I would respond with facts but never under estimate when someone starts out looking for bad practice (especially when under applied pressure) they will continue. They also showed contempt to the impacts this can have on others as the further they go in they are no longer impartial as they have to prove they are right to save face.
Oh come on, man fucking up. The Athfuckin'letic invent a story which conveniently mentions City doing checks.I wouldn't be surprised if the club is doing a check just in case. Just because we suspected and are investigating it doesnt mean there is a whistle blower.
On the other hand, the fact that we are doing a check in the first place seems a bit worrying..