Kinkys Left Foot
Well-Known Member
I can't help but think that changes to FFP to Compensate for changes in the PL arena, market prices, inflation etc is now merely applying lipstick to the ever increasingly ugly pig.
In addition the process for dealing with allegations of rule breaches such as ours should not be in front of a 3 person committee under PL auspices. That's adequate for dealing with accounting matters of exceeding the PSR on a "Yep we did it governer" basis but not for allegations of fraud, which is what these charges are. Its clear, to investigate those matters outside of 6 years from the point of charging the PL are going to have to establish, on the balance of probability at least, we conducted fraudulent business practices not once, but as a normal course of business.
There should be a clear delineation between the parties to the arbitration and the commitee or court hearing. It clearly leaves open the path for assertions of unconscious bias by maligned parties in its current format despite protestations of professional integrity. I am still perturbed by the fact, on seeking a ruling, that the courts found this arbitration procedure was fitting to hear these charges, despite our legal protestations. I certainly have a somewhat diminished confidence that we will be exonerated of all malfeasance, but we shall see.
In addition the process for dealing with allegations of rule breaches such as ours should not be in front of a 3 person committee under PL auspices. That's adequate for dealing with accounting matters of exceeding the PSR on a "Yep we did it governer" basis but not for allegations of fraud, which is what these charges are. Its clear, to investigate those matters outside of 6 years from the point of charging the PL are going to have to establish, on the balance of probability at least, we conducted fraudulent business practices not once, but as a normal course of business.
There should be a clear delineation between the parties to the arbitration and the commitee or court hearing. It clearly leaves open the path for assertions of unconscious bias by maligned parties in its current format despite protestations of professional integrity. I am still perturbed by the fact, on seeking a ruling, that the courts found this arbitration procedure was fitting to hear these charges, despite our legal protestations. I certainly have a somewhat diminished confidence that we will be exonerated of all malfeasance, but we shall see.
Last edited: