TonyColemansbagofapples
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2017
- Messages
- 6,663
Doesn’t slobalob play for the dippers?Flowerpot men. Flobalobaloba
Doesn’t slobalob play for the dippers?Flowerpot men. Flobalobaloba
He did but he's on his way out after getting caught with a little weed.Doesn’t slobalob play for the dippers?
And PSR.They have more chance of winning the league than building a new stadium.
Another pr exercise to placate the masses.
I imagine the banal shite he's gonna spout about his time in the hotseat would rival the Captain of the Titanic for spin..The ****’s too busy updating his CV and rewriting his LinkedIn page to have any time to congratulate City.
Well whoever it is, the cabbage could have done equally as good a job!Who survives longer - Dicky Masters or Ruben Interim?
No. We don't want that to happen. It will just mean that "they concealed the evidence" hence the non cooperation charges. Something like a statement that the panel completely exonerated Manchester City of all charges brought by the Premier League would do nicely. Or words to that affect. Back to you got away with it or brown envelopes then.115 (or whatever) times "no evidence" will do nicely.
Does that include any politicking?Please, keep the politicking out of the thread. If it continues, threadbans will be issued.
Yep, we will bribe our way to victory. Mad how idiots who say this don't ever ask why we never bribed initially to save our reputation.No. We don't want that to happen. It will just mean that "they concealed the evidence" hence the non cooperation charges. Something like a statement that the panel completely exonerated Manchester City of all charges brought by the Premier League would do nicely. Or words to that affect. Back to you got away with it or brown envelopes then.
No. We don't want that to happen. It will just mean that "they concealed the evidence" hence the non cooperation charges. Something like a statement that the panel completely exonerated Manchester City of all charges brought by the Premier League would do nicely. Or words to that affect. Back to you got away with it or brown envelopes then.
If we're cleared the opinions of our detractors will mean fuck all to me. "No evidence" would be just fine.No. We don't want that to happen. It will just mean that "they concealed the evidence" hence the non cooperation charges. Something like a statement that the panel completely exonerated Manchester City of all charges brought by the Premier League would do nicely. Or words to that affect. Back to you got away with it or brown envelopes then.
'What a schlump!'In Arabic.
If we're cleared the opinions of our detractors will mean fuck all to me. "No evidence" would be just fine.
We’re boiling some piss today.
‘115, got away with it, chequebook manager, Courtinhohoho money, refuse to play them….’
All cos we’ve signed another player : )
Can’t wait till we announce Marmoush.
I'm with you on that mate!will someone please let me know when the grown ups have finished debating and we can go back to calling harris/magic twat a **** please, thats far more my level of discourse
No no no he’s ’buying his way out of trouble’‘Cheque book manager’ net spend over the last 5 years is below Palace and on a par with Bournemouth and Fulham. 4 league titles in that time.
‘Cheque book manager’ net spend over the last 5 years is below Palace and on a par with Bournemouth and Fulham. 4 league titles in that time.
Didnt you know when liverpool won it, all their players cost 5 quid and a bag of crisps, just the 100 plus million on the frontline, 85m centre back and 70m goalkeeper plus all the others spoil the narrative, but you know the dippers never let the truth get in the way of a good story.Can someone highlight when a team last had a sustained period of success surviving on free transfers and the youth team? This is top level sport, if you don’t spend you are left behind in the arms race.