PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I like TH’s videos in the transfer thread and I don’t mind them in here.

That said 115 is by far the most sensitive subject for the vast majority of City fans and it’s a thread probably not suited to TH’s usual videos with hindsight just because a lot of posters are desperate for good news, particularly from posters like TH.

As for TH being a WUM that’s nonsense.
 
Scaring Europe to Death said:
Mid afternoon I attended a cricket umpires meeting to discuss a few potential rule changes for the Cheshire County League, essentially because the new season is on the horizon, and (weather permitting) is scheduled to start on the same day as City's game at Goodison Park

Anyway, nothing has really changed

It's still 50 Overs per side and maximum 13 Overs per bowler

In the meantime this thread has increased by 7 pages.

Is it worth checking what I've missed, or are we still going round in circles, albeit with a few anonymous insults and maybe the odd grammar lesson?
Click to expand...
Any fielding restrictions?
 
Lord Blue said:
think every few months or so we should have a post of the month thread.
Click to expand...
by its very definition,
wouldn't there have to be one every month?

UPew.gif
 
Scaring Europe to Death said:
Mid afternoon I attended a cricket umpires meeting to discuss a few potential rule changes for the Cheshire County League, essentially because the new season is on the horizon, and (weather permitting) is scheduled to start on the same day as City's game at Goodison Park

Anyway, nothing has really changed

It's still 50 Overs per side and maximum 13 Overs per bowler

In the meantime this thread has increased by 7 pages.

Is it worth checking what I've missed, or are we still going round in circles, albeit with a few anonymous insults and maybe the odd grammar lesson?
Click to expand...
Your dedication to the noble sport of cricket is more noteworthy.
 
MarsLlama said:
I’ve been here a lot longer than five minutes, I don’t know much about Tolmie, but he is objectively a WUM. Wind Up Merchant - that’s his thing, winding people up! I doubt he would even dispute that tag.
Click to expand...

Those comments show how much you know. JCL.
 
MarsLlama said:
My personal opinion is that Tolmie doesn't currently have any real knowledge of the inside workings of City at all, and he drops hints for apparently no reason other than he likes winding people up. I think that he moved to X because he thought it would get him more attention than he was getting here, and he moved back here because the people on X were far far quicker to catch on to him than he expected.

To be clear, that's purely my opinion of his footballing knowledge. It is pretty much undeniable that he is a very decent person in real life and has dedicated a huge amount of his life to helping children from challenging circumstances - if I was not in exactly the same boat, having worked with young people for my entire adult life, I probably wouldn't bother calling him out whatsoever.

But some people will say he's just doing it for fun and isn't claiming to be a real source of knowledge, and some people will say he does it out of the goodness of his heart and it's not his fault that he's usually incorrect. By definition, that means defences are split.
Click to expand...
Did you not read the tweet tolm put on X about himself and who he was?

I suggest you read it and revisit your above post.
 
Mcfc1.9.8.0 said:
Yes. So maybe he thinks he’s a WUM or an attention seeker.
Click to expand...
In that case why doesn`t he use the IGNORE button like all the other people who have the same problem with Tolm. That way the people like myself and others who don`t have a problem with Tolm can happily sit back and enjoy reading his posts and not have to read the shit thats thrown at him and clogging up the thread/s ?
Quite simple really I`d have thought.
 
bluekeith said:
Tolmie is full of shit he knew he got folks hopes up and did nothing about it.
Click to expand...
Probably at work all day mate. Nothing more to it than that. Some people reading too much into an early morning post, which he followed up on later anyway.
It’s no big deal in my book.

Fwiw, myself and many others on here would completely disagree with your opinion of him.
 
MarsLlama said:
I’ve been here a lot longer than five minutes, I don’t know much about Tolmie, but he is objectively a WUM. Wind Up Merchant - that’s his thing, winding people up! I doubt he would even dispute that tag.
Click to expand...
And yet like a lot of other Blue Mooners you don`t do the correct thing and have him on your Ignore list ?
 
Last edited:
oakiecokie said:
In that case why doesn`t he use the IGNORE button like all the other people who have the same problem with Tolm. That way the people like myself and others who don`t have a problem with Tolm can happily sit back and enjoy reading his posts and not have to read the shit thats thrown at him and clogging up the thread/s ?
Quite simple really I`d have thought.
Click to expand...
I’ve no idea you’ll have to ask him I only said you can’t criticise son for having a low post count of a new joining date when they could be looking at the forum years and only just decided to take the plunge and post. If it’s a new account and it’s obvious there her on the wind up then that would be fine. It’s obvious a lot that time TH but there’s a fair few that don’t so that other member is just having an opinion on him which many agree with so he’s obviously not on the wind up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top