eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 7,240
- Team supported
- Manchester city
Delooney is a revisionist idiot.And what if anything, was his reply?
Delooney is a revisionist idiot.And what if anything, was his reply?
Back in 2019 Pannick won the Supreme Court case against Johnson after parliament was prorogued. Subsequently Johnson hired Pannick to represent him in a separate case.I'd be far happier if Lord Pannick were to be offered the gig...
Perhaps even some of the things the 115 contain are covered in that Settlement?I'm not so sure the club does regret it. There were a lot of outstanding issues that could have gone either way at the Adjudicatory Chamber and a subsequent CAS appeal. Much more than in 2019, and I imagine with better evidence to support them as well. On the other hand, Infantino didn't seem to have much appetite for a long fight either and the club's threat to challenge FFP in court was an incentive to settle. I imagine both sides were happy with a "political" solution.
I'm 100% convinced that we have been squeaky clean for a long time. Unfortunately, a combination of complacency and ineptitude that enabled the hack of millions of unencrypted emails left us open to scrutiny all those years ago.I wouldn’t. He is a formidable opponent. If we fell foul of any regs……
The man is a lawyer and a very highly qualified and experienced one at that. As such he has to be objective, detached and dispassionate and to view evidence through such eyes. It is unlikely that he has any "disposition" to City and it is unlikely to of any relevance if he has since his job will not be to participate in case after case against City but to regulate the PL. We don't know, at the moment, exactly the details of such a post and must wait for the government to tell us and introduce legislation to set up the post/department. Our political masters are clearly dissatisfied with the situation at the moment and there are enough MPs with an interest in football to ensure that a wide variety of views on it are expressed so the chances of a regulator with scores to settle with City would seem to be negligeable. So, let's calm down and realise that our persecutors aren't hiding behind every tree!I wasn't suggesting he was corrupt but I did say in my post that his disposition to the club might not be good as he has been involved in a high profile case against us. It's pure guesswork on your part that he may have advised UEFA that their case was very weak.
If we are clean, and I’m sure we are, a competent regulator is to our advantage. He will clip the redshirts’ wings and put an end to the nonsense we get from them.The man is a lawyer and a very highly qualified and experienced one at that. As such he has to be objective, detached and dispassionate and to view evidence through such eyes. It is unlikely that he has any "disposition" to City and it is unlikely to of any relevance if he has since his job will not be to participate in case after case against City but to regulate the PL. We don't know, at the moment, exactly the details of such a post and must wait for the government to tell us and introduce legislation to set up the post/department. Our political masters are clearly dissatisfied with the situation at the moment and there are enough MPs with an interest in football to ensure that a wide variety of views on it are expressed so the chances of a regulator with scores to settle with City would seem to be negligeable. So, let's calm down and realise that our persecutors aren't hiding behind every tree!
Nailed on whoever is in charge if when the regulator comes in will be one of the red shirts fanHe probably knows how piss weak the uefa case was then.
I'd be more worried if we find out he's a rag or dipper.
The Peroxide Bullshitter wants dispensation for new investment to allow them to grow their business in responding to this CRYSTAL PALACE spokesman, clearly ignoring we are being charged 115 for allegedly doing the very same.Mmmmm no don't say
Oh he didn’t reply. I doubt he will.And what if anything, was his reply?