The hearing is of a civil nature, so guilty or not guilty are not terms that can be used. Strictly speaking, there are no “charges” rather claims that we broke some rules. We refute those claims and the dispute is settled by arbitration. It’s either “The PL has not proved their case on the balance of probabilities” or the opposite. Criminal law whether Scottish (!) or English does not come into it.
Incidently, the Grauniad (who else?) ran a whole piece based on CAS’s failure to say “not guilty” suggesting CAS thought our case was weak, despite saying 11 times “There is NO evidence that….”