For an ordinary fan rather than a lawyer or an accountant I thought Steve nailed his point.
The thing is why has he been made to talk up about it, He knows just as much as anybody else outside of the club,
Yes, it's a fan debate and Sky and its pundits know how to twist a story to suit their fan base, But legally should the major backer of the Premier League (Sky) be allowed to debate the 115 unproven charges?
I feel for Steve because he was very much cannon fodder, Spit the Dog Carragher was leading the blind and putting words into others' fans' mouths and was so untrue and lies, It was just a witch hunt with hate by the scum spitter.
Manchester City should be getting Banning orders to Sky and the overlap for shows like this because it's a controlled witch-hunt before proven guilty,
The thing is, Manchester City owners doesn't have to prove we are innocent, it's the Premier Leauge that has to prove we are guilty and find any wrongdoings, Uefa very quickly found out we were in the clear and CAS found NO dodgy deals or Sponsorships deals, All that come out was a fine for time-barred information being release by Manchester City to Uefa.
MANCHESTER CITY, Stop the media witch hunt by Sky and other media outlets, Legally nobody should be asking questions and pointing fingers before the outcome, SKY and its Pundits are leading the witch hunt and its them that are saying we are guilty,
FUCK me, Gary Neville on the Overlap made an outstanding statement about 2 Italian clubs using drugs or doping when he and United played them in the champions league, How can somebody say that sort of thing in public and show it on youtube without punishment or any sort of repercussions.
