johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
WP informs us 0 is neither positive nor negative - not sure if that is the same though....Is that plus or minus zero?
WP informs us 0 is neither positive nor negative - not sure if that is the same though....Is that plus or minus zero?
April 1st I’m going for.For some reason I'm thinking Friday for the decision, don't ask me why
In fairness, the Tribunal didn't say that - that was a submission by HMRC's counsel. From what I can see the Tribunal rejected that...
"The fact that the opinions remained those of Mr Thompson does not detract from this; the control arises from Sky's ability to control the output of the programmes and other services... Mr Thompson had control over his own opinions"
Really?.. Mr Thompson had control over his own opinions"
Incorrect. Dinner is the largest meal of the day, usually the one in the late afternoon/evening.It's not called dinner it's called tea.
Dinner is what people are eating around now
Yes.So if you don’t eat anything between morning and night about 12 hrs gap, wouldn’t that also considered as fasting ?
No , you got confused with jackie tits outIf you add a plus zero to a minus zero would the universe end?
Breakfast, dinner, tea, supper.Incorrect. Dinner is the largest meal of the day, usually the one in the late afternoon/evening.
4pm Friday will be when it’s leakedFor some reason I'm thinking Friday for the decision, don't ask me why
Unbelievable Jeff.
Very wrong.Breakfast, dinner, tea, supper.
By the way, here is a good example of the chaos that will ensue after the decision is published from people claiming it says one thing and others claiming it says something different - and nobody will know for sure. It is possible to have 2 valid interpretations.
Yes.... regardless of how long it takes, say 5 years (not out of the question), we are definitely one day closer.Are you sure?
I sincerely hope so mate.For me there is one of three not two verdicts.
Guilty, innocent or innocent with caveats.
Whilst the first is too much to even think about I would rather not have the third option either. This gave the cartel too much ambiguity and hence the “got away with it due to time barring”.
An unequivocal and Crystal clear innocent could finally break the morale of the bitter and twisted.
Things that are time barred don't mean that we're guilty of them. They were exactly that....time barred. But I get where you're coming from.For me there is one of three not two verdicts.
Guilty, innocent or innocent with caveats.
Whilst the first is too much to even think about I would rather not have the third option either. This gave the cartel too much ambiguity and hence the “got away with it due to time barring”.
An unequivocal and Crystal clear innocent could finally break the morale of the bitter and twisted.
It's a break from your overnight fast.It needs to be soon because we are resorting now to awkward small talk. ‘Why is breakfast called breakfast?’