Haven’t clicked on it, don’t need to as I know what the tedious **** will have said.
I hope, but don’t remotely expect the club to engage in a campaign of retribution against the most strident and egregious (and high profile) actors in defamation against the club once these preposterous charges are disproved.
Some, like Jordon are canny enough to stay (just) the right side of the line, but others (notably Carragher when he questioned the veracity of our accounts recently) have not and I just wish there were legal consequences for that, especially given the platform he was airing it on.
I’m not holding my breath though.
Packed in Talksport 4 years ago as its anti City agenda was becoming clear.
Talksport now employing that prat says all you need to know.
Avoid
I don’t think you can characterise Carragher as a ‘no mark’ in terms of his media footprint.The club don’t need to go after these no marks as once this is put to bed they will have nothing to cling onto in the hope their shit team in red can stop City. The boiling of piss will be fantastic and their realisation they expanded years of energy trying to call City cheats was all for nothing, leaving them for what they are. Howling at the moon conspiracy theorists.
thats the logical conclusion I come to. I dont think its a theory either, it would be stupid for Utd, Talkport etc to not have control over the louder public voices. And Goldbridge has shown he will say anything for anyone.I have a theory with Goldbridge.
I think considering Neil Ashton - former chief football writer of The Sun (owner of talkSPORT) is PR advisor to United. I think considering the size of his fan channels, to reel Goldbridge in a little and to use him as a narrative spinner to the supporters, he has offered him interviews with United players i.e. Hojlund, and got him a cushty job at talkSPORT in return.
Some United fans can't seem to understand his standing with Ten Hag and how he always seems to back him regardless, which hints that he has been possibly controlled in some way to spin a narrative.
I just think if a City fans channel grew that big, City would intervene in someway to control some of the narrative and offer exclusive bites here and there in return. That is what I think has happened with Goldbridge.
Likely wrong, but just a theory.
Bellends are always best ignored.100% he is just a knobhead sitting in his bedroom with his pj's on that his mum bought him. He isn't thick he his good at playing to his audience and earning good money from the dippers and rags.
He talks bollocks like 99.99% of the press/media.
I really couldn't give a fuck what this knobhead says. Does he attend rags matches ? Nope he is just playing the rags and earning money from them.
Hats of to him, he has found an easy way to make a living better than labouring for 40hrs a week. But honestly why any City fan would listen to him is beyond me
100% he is just a knobhead sitting in his bedroom with his pj's on that his mum bought him. He isn't thick he his good at playing to his audience and earning good money from the dippers and rags.
He talks bollocks like 99.99% of the press/media.
I really couldn't give a fuck what this knobhead says. Does he attend rags matches ? Nope he is just playing the rags and earning money from them.
Hats of to him, he has found an easy way to make a living better than labouring for 40hrs a week. But honestly why any City fan would listen to him is beyond me