Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
Posh ****!
Air quality is fucking terrible here at the minute, my asthma is in bite.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Air quality is fucking terrible here at the minute, my asthma is in bite.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,096
Posh ****!
Air quality is fucking terrible here at the minute, my asthma is in bite.
You are in CM too? Some sort of Bluemoon reunion no-one told me about? :(
But yes, air quality this time of year is always bad.
Edit: And while I think about it. Not at all posh, you cheeky bastard. Just a ****.
Last edited:
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,610
- Team supported
- Manchester City
View attachment 115063
Never a truer word written.
You could also add that clubs are now asset stripping to stay inside the new financial rules. Whilst rags for example just carry on with their model.
How can Newcastle possibly having to sell players to be within the new regs when they have the riches owner in the UK be right ?
How can it be right that the club with the biggest debt is going to the government to fund their new statium. Also were fined for failing UEFA ffp by nearly 50million but pass the pl regs.
How can it be right that a club funding its own statium is now struggling to meet the regs and has points deducted
One statium could be state funded like WHU who got a free statium. How is that fair on clubs that had to fund their own statium.
The PL is a total shambles
Last edited:
I thought United was minor breach and we did not know how much they failed by. That amount they should have resulted in serious sanctions not tiny fineYou could also add that clubs are now asset stripping to stay inside the new financial rules. Whilst rags for example just carry on with their model.
How can Newcastle possibly having to sell players to be within the new regs when they have the riches owner in the UK be right ?
How can it be right that the club with the biggest debt is going to the government to fund their new statium. Also were fined for failing UEFA ffp by nearly 50million but pass the pl regs.
How can it be right that a club funding its own statium is now struggling to meet the regs and has points deducted
One statium could be state funded like WHU who got a free statium. How is that fair on clubs that had to fund their own statium.
The PL is a total shambles
jim tolmies perm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 2,518
Me and my Mrs. are just Pattaya scumbags in a little condo...;)You are in CM too? Some sort of Bluemoon reunion no-one told me about? :(
But yes, air quality this time of year is always bad.
Edit: And while I think about it. Not at all posh, you cheeky bastard. Just a ****.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,610
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I thought United was minor breach and we did not know how much they failed by. That amount they should have resulted in serious sanctions not tiny fine
they were unable to adjust for €47m of Covid losses in the 2022 monitoring period because of an unforeseen change in how Uefa treated those losses during the transition to its revised financial sustainability regulatory framework. The losses came on top of €234m of pandemic-related losses across 2019-20 and 2020-21.
If UEFA thought only 6 emails from the stolen 5 to 6 million documents were worthy as evidence, where are the Premier League getting any new evidence from? Based on the CAS case, without any new compelling evidence, it's unlikely the PL will be able to prove that City are guilty of financial wrong doing. This is a witch hunt pure and simple. Why aren't the press reporting this angle? Because the baying mob want blood and the facts spoil a good story. Ignore the click-bait.
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,340
Keeping up standards can be a bit of a burdenStandard of proof.
HalfwayUpTheKippax
Well-Known Member
Limitations, where do you want your statue?Wrong again, it is true that there’s no time bar in the Premier League rules unlike UEFA’s. Thats a fact, I don’t care if you can’t stomach it.
Both are subject to the law of the land in which they’re enforced, like every single contract ever written which is why no one feels the needs to spell it out in every post.
That is what you’re pointing out, but that is something completely different. The panel won’t be making judgements on the statue of limitations, just as CAS would have allowed the earlier evidence into the case if it was looking at the PL’s rule book and the club would have to go to a high court after a verdict to appeal on the grounds of the statute of limitations.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
they were unable to adjust for €47m of Covid losses in the 2022 monitoring period because of an unforeseen change in how Uefa treated those losses during the transition to its revised financial sustainability regulatory framework. The losses came on top of €234m of pandemic-related losses across 2019-20 and 2020-21.
Weren’t United the only club claiming covid losses in the Premier League in their 2022 accounts. Dodgy as fuck that.