OntarioBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 12,404
Just one more thought. Won’t this just drive the “big“ clubs in the premier league to look at a European Super League again ?
Possibly not, but it’s a dispute that arises out of a legal agreement that is subject to and will be enforced via English and Welsh law and it is therefore undeniably a legal case.It's not a legal case in the sense of what most people recognise.
Not quite as they’re proposing a 2 tier system. Qualify for European competition and you mirror UEFA rules at 70% of revenue. Not qualifying for Europe, 85% of revenue is the proposal. Currently would make no real difference to City domestically, but will potentially hamper Villa and the Bar-codes.This isn’t that complicated. There’s 2 parts.
1) Each club can spend 85% of revenue. This is agreed on and happening.
2) No club can spend more than 6x revenue of 20th team. Things agreed on principle but details tbc and voted on again.
Nowhere are Luton going to be allowed to spend £560m a year on wages and transfers, that would break PSR, wouldn’t it?
The only thing this does is make sure that the gap between top and bottom doesn’t grow too big by incentivising the top clubs to keep growing the revenues of the league as a whole.
No doubt. But I'll start crapping myself when City are faced with attending the Old Bailey, which I'm pretty sure we'd prefer.Legal cases are also dealt with in arbitration, quasi courts or other tribunals.
Well tbf ESL looks better right now which is sickening to sayJust one more thought. Won’t this just drive the “big“ clubs in the premier league to look at a European Super League again ?
I'm not getting into splitting hairs. City fans have been through enough, myself included.Possibly not, but it’s a dispute that arises out of a legal agreement that is subject to and will be enforced via English and Welsh law and it is therefore undeniably a legal case.
If you’d said that isn’t what most people would recognise as a legal case then you might very well be correct.
You're not wrong about the split in Irish football. After that, I'm afraid, you're all over the place.I think Irish football used to be a single all Ireland league but split on religious lines.
It extended to almost everything. Try getting a job in Dublin at that time if you were a protestant etc etc.
Guiness was a London Company that moved to Dublin for tax reasons. The entire family converted to Catholicism.
In fairness the reverse was true in n.ireland. Thus, for example, a body had to be set up to ensure that catholics there got a fair shake in the housing market.
You've got to think they would. Why the fuck would investors stay in a league, that's been the most attractive market in world football, after it's been turned into a fucking pubs league CO-OP ?Just one more thought. Won’t this just drive the “big“ clubs in the premier league to look at a European Super League again ?
No surprise there then. It's a special place for a special species, of bottom dwelling, pillow biting, cunts.Given the Rags also voted against the proposals today I thought i would nip over to the CAF to see their opinion. No surprise to see they have had more posts on our 115 Breaches thread than on the new proposals.
Even less surprising is that there isnt a single comment anywhere suggesting that we may in fact be innocent, if we "get away with it" then it will be due to bribes, corruption, politcal pressure etc..
One thing is for sure there will be a complete meltdown over there whenever to findings are released.