PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I think Irish football used to be a single all Ireland league but split on religious lines.
It extended to almost everything. Try getting a job in Dublin at that time if you were a protestant etc etc.
Guiness was a London Company that moved to Dublin for tax reasons. The entire family converted to Catholicism.
In fairness the reverse was true in n.ireland. Thus, for example, a body had to be set up to ensure that catholics there got a fair shake in the housing market.
You're not wrong about the split in Irish football. After that, I'm afraid, you're all over the place.
There would have been some shameful anti-Protestant attacks (often - but certainly not always - the settling of personal scores) in the immediate aftermath of independence but it really didn't last very long in the Republic. Mostly because the small Protestant population (6% or so) posed no threat to anybody.
Trinity College Dublin (back, in the day, an exclusively Protestant institution was guaranteed representation in the Seanad (equivalent to the House of Lords) in the 1930s and before Douglas Hyde - the first President elected in independent Ireland - was a Protestant.
There was no gerrymandering of votes, no active discrimination in housing and employment like there was against Catholics in Northern Ireland. It's simply not accurate to equate the two.
All Irish cities still have active Protestant Cathedrals that are still in regular use. Small towns like Killaloe and Bandon in Clare and Cok still are and always have been predominantly Protestant.
Arthur and the rest of the Guinness family were famously Protestant Dubliners (and Unionists too). Their business was always rather successful than say, the Catholic-owned (I think) Murphys. I have no idea if they have converted since. Like most people in Ireland (as opposed to Norn Iron), I simply don't care.
 
Given the Rags also voted against the proposals today I thought i would nip over to the CAF to see their opinion. No surprise to see they have had more posts on our 115 Breaches thread than on the new proposals.

Even less surprising is that there isnt a single comment anywhere suggesting that we may in fact be innocent, if we "get away with it" then it will be due to bribes, corruption, politcal pressure etc..

One thing is for sure there will be a complete meltdown over there whenever to findings are released.
 
Just one more thought. Won’t this just drive the “big“ clubs in the premier league to look at a European Super League again ?
You've got to think they would. Why the fuck would investors stay in a league, that's been the most attractive market in world football, after it's been turned into a fucking pubs league CO-OP ?
 
Given the Rags also voted against the proposals today I thought i would nip over to the CAF to see their opinion. No surprise to see they have had more posts on our 115 Breaches thread than on the new proposals.

Even less surprising is that there isnt a single comment anywhere suggesting that we may in fact be innocent, if we "get away with it" then it will be due to bribes, corruption, politcal pressure etc..

One thing is for sure there will be a complete meltdown over there whenever to findings are released.
No surprise there then. It's a special place for a special species, of bottom dwelling, pillow biting, cunts.
 
So, if I understand things correctly all 20 teams in the Premier League will be allowed to spend the same amount of money. The figure being touted is £500m. In 2023 only three Premier league Clubs had revenue higher than £500m so any of the other 17 Clubs which wishes to spend the cap amount will have to borrow money. Within a few short years we could easily see half the teams in the league insolvent and out of business.

Meanwhile those Clubs with the high revenues will be forced to cut spending and will very quickly find themselves falling behind the big European Clubs.

Are the people running the Premier League so blind they cant see this.

Btw how did Newcastle vote ?
As I understand it the wages, transfer amortisation and agents fees can’t exceed 85% of turnover, so under your scenario you’re restricted to 85% (70% if you’re playing European football) of turnover or £500m, whichever figure is lower.
 
Given the Rags also voted against the proposals today I thought i would nip over to the CAF to see their opinion. No surprise to see they have had more posts on our 115 Breaches thread than on the new proposals.

Even less surprising is that there isnt a single comment anywhere suggesting that we may in fact be innocent, if we "get away with it" then it will be due to bribes, corruption, politcal pressure etc..

One thing is for sure there will be a complete meltdown over there whenever to findings are released.
Wait till Sandra Tinbridge will turn on the webcam for saying that he is all in for this
 
No doubt. But I'll start crapping myself when City are faced with attending the Old Bailey, which I'm pretty sure we'd prefer.

If this was the case, I doubt this whole ridiculous Speckled Jim charade wouldn't have got past the CPS. This whole farce is a witchunt, & is a complete waste of time & money, purely in the pursuit of stopping City off the pitch because the Red Top Mafia & Spuds have failed to stop us on it.

That's the long & short of it, & we need to stop dressing it up to being something it clearly isn't.
Civil fraud is really serious. As are the allegations in this matter/case/PL complaint or whatever you call it.
 
Heaven help the psychiatric health professionals in this country when we are cleared.
There is going to be an awful lot of people who will need an awful lot of help to deal with the crushing disappointment.
Those Pip applications are going to go through the roof!
 
The red top clubs and spurs created this lie over 10 years ago.
They fueled the lie and fed the flames to the fans all over the world.
With the help of paid for opinion piece so called journalists to pour more fuel on the fire every fuckin day.
They can all fuck off and stop watching football.
They "all of them" including the fans of other clubs created and contributed to the lie that we are cheats , so when we are proven to be innocent ( which I still find ludicrous that we should have to) the lot of em can go cry in a big bowl of soup together.
 
I think Irish football used to be a single all Ireland league but split on religious lines.
It extended to almost everything. Try getting a job in Dublin at that time if you were a protestant etc etc.
Guiness was a London Company that moved to Dublin for tax reasons. The entire family converted to Catholicism.
In fairness the reverse was true in n.ireland.
A former work colleague of mine claimed that the split between the Irish League and the League of Ireland happened before partition. I was not convinced and looked it up.

Most of the teams in the Irish League from its formation in 1890 were from the Belfast area. The clubs from the then Irish Free State (Shelbourne and Bohemians) left on partition in 1919-20. They subsequently joined the new League of Ireland in 1921.

Irish Nationalists and Republicans always dismissed football (and cricket) as 'garrison' sports and opted for GAA sports.

Subsequently there were inter-league matches between the Irish League and the League of Ireland. My work colleague, from North Belfast, claimed that both teams wanted to play in green.

'How will we know who is in which team? was the obvious question. 'Sure, we will be able to tell!' said the Northern Irish representative.
 
Masters presiding over the biggest act of commercial incompetence, gross misconduct and dereliction of duty in the history of commerce - never-mind sporting history. Talk about missed opportunities for investment and cementing the PL as the most prestigious in the World for years to come
All to appease the protectionist cowards. The man needs stringing up - but having no backbone, he'd just flutter. Complete imbecile.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top