PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Metal Biker]

Letters went out very recently. That was after the verbal warnings.

Absolutely real, as is it being done from a position of strength.

 

[Stoned Rose]

2:02 to about 2:30. He claims he hasn't but his chat partner takes the piss and states the actuality of it.
Classic misdirection to get round the keep quiet clause that was probably included in the letter.

His chat partner says fuck all of the sort mate.

That video proves absolutely nothing.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Letters went out very recently. That was after the verbal warnings.

Absolutely real, as is it being done from a position of strength.

Absolutely believe you mate.

The video the other poster is pointing to doesn’t “prove” it though, no matter what he claims.

 

[Mcfc1.9.8.0]

I believe you. But there is no 'proof' available or ou there that people are referring to, or anything official that can be claimed in the way it has been, as proof we have been cleared.

Goldbridge and that scouse jurno practically said they got one

 

[BlueAnorak]

It's been discussed many times on here. Under UK law, which the PL have to follow, there is a 6-year limitation period unless there's evidence of fraud.

It's quite possible that the IC have looked at the evidence and ruled out the possibility of fraud. That would almost certainly mean that only transactions in the 2016/17 and 2017/18 financial years could be considered. That would completely rule out the Mancini contract and the Fordham image rights stuff.

The only thing they could consider is 2 years of the Etihad sponsorship, and they're going nowhere with that.

Much better put than I could PB..
But it backs up my observational logic that without proof of fraud, much of the prosecutions case is the equivalent of last night's chip paper.

 

[Metal Biker]

Absolutely believe you mate.

The video the other poster is pointing to doesn’t “prove” it though, no matter what he claims.

It alludes to it though, which is kind of the point.

Or do you just not like the poster in question?

 

[halfcenturyup]

It alludes to it though, which is kind of the point.

Or do you just not like the poster in question?

People shouldn't get too hung up on proof. The only proof that letters have been sent will be if someone who got a letter shows it to the watching world. The only proof that the club has been found innocent will be when PL and club statements are issued. In the meantime, we can only make educated guesses based on what we hear and, like refereeing, that will always be subjective.

 

[Coatigan]

So where'd the (multiple) rumours come from?
Why the sudden and drastic change in tone surrounding the club (Goldbridges comments)?
Why no mention of "115" from the usual suspects this week (Spitty, Neville etc)?

The key issue isn't about whether City have been cleared or not, but clearly something HAS occured that has put City in a boistrous mood about the whole affair. Kind of odd that everything has occured within the space of a few days of each other.

Where do any online rumours come from? Where does any confirmation bias come from?

 

[Coatigan]

Goldbridge and that scouse jurno practically said they got one

They didn't though. People are using body language, and the fact he talks slightly less shit as 'proof'.

 

[Plays By Sense Of Smell]

Open a food establishment called The Mancheatery.