PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I thought the Wolves player put Guardiol off his shot at the time, which if it happened anywhere else on the pitch would be a foul, and a booking if the player wore sky blue. I will look at it again sometime. Now lets have a discussion whether the push on Ake just before half time should have been a penalty. I thought it should and expected the ref to start the second half with a penalty to us, like united that time. Some fecking hope;-)

when was that?
 
I'll buy that.
Before it was city played great but the 115 charges and City have a game next week but the 115 charges etc etc.
Just skimming through any City related stuff on YouTube, and where the comments sections were liberally sprinkled with attempted snidey put- downs and accusations and numerous repeats of their favourite number until very recently…..……now I can’t see any at all.
It‘s almost as if someone said something in someone’s ear.
 
The PL will look a bunch of prats whatever happens. We just disagree as to which outcome (losing in court or dropping charges) is the lesser of two evils from a reputation perspective.
I believe that if the charges are to be dropped it will happen just after the end of the season in the hope that the Euros will concentrate minds elsewhere.
If they had any sense they'd drop the charges immediately. It's the only chance they have of knocking us off the 4-peat. Right now we are singularly focused and it's damn near impossible to knock us off our mission. Not that I think it would work, but by announcing that we're cleared now there's at least a chance that we lose just enough of our focus to possibly encounter a slight slip. As it stands, Pep has the bit firmly embedded in his teeth and there's no way anyone is going to outwill us over 90 minutes...Personally, I want us to maintain the chip on our shoulder for at least 3 more weeks,,,
 
It's not a "case". The independent panel reviewed the Prem's submission and basically told them "Fugget About It! What are they going to go forward with? They're sitting there with their dick's in their hands....
Fucking he’ll, you know what I mean. It is a case. It’s a case/charges brought by the PL against City.
 
Fucking he’ll, you know what I mean. It is a case. It’s a case/charges brought by the PL against City.
I know, but I'm saying the "case" needs the green light from the commision in order to proceed to a hearing and I'm firmly among those who believe the panel has already given the PL the thumbs down. And I'm willing to bet anyone anything they want that it's already over.
 
Regardless of the letters, could it be that certain outlets have heard that City have argued the case to a sufficient degree that the case has no merit?
Has it got to that stage yet? Surely the information is has been examined by the lackeys ready for be KCs to do their best Maybe just, maybe the lackeys are saying we can’t find sufficient evidence to proceed, this would need the exit strategy that has been talked about
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.