PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Multiple sources actually from the very top of this particular food chain. Top top top. Sorry but that’s just the truth on this one.
Come on ffs Stefan.

Let’s say you were on pints terms with “top top top” figures - I’m thinking Khaldoon, Masters, someone from the panel - the last person they’re going to tell anything of this importance to is the guy who goes on Talksport to answer questions on this very topic. The guy who could literally have a slip of the tongue, show some particularly obvious body language etc that basically gives the game away.

You’re literally the last person they would tell.
 
Based on the little I know, my understanding is that the outcome has been decided for a few months.

The PL have requested the delay in publication and my supposition is that they want the time to headhunt a new CEO, because Masters won't survive once the verdict is public.

Fuck me I really want this to be the case.
 
Right, everyone attack slbn.
UOVpMtU8LgxS.gif
 
Based on the little I know, my understanding is that the outcome has been decided for a few months.

The PL have requested the delay in publication and my supposition is that they want the time to headhunt a new CEO, because Masters won't survive once the verdict is public.

Level 7 VEI intensity volcanic eruption incoming..

Please stand by till we have a new CEO!
 
Come on ffs Stefan.

Let’s say you were on pints terms with “top top top” figures - I’m thinking Khaldoon, Masters, someone from the panel - the last person they’re going to tell anything of this importance to is the guy who goes on Talksport to answer questions on this very topic. The guy who could literally have a slip of the tongue, show some particularly obvious body language etc that basically gives the game away.

You’re literally the last person they would tell.
You got me. I am making it all up. The decision was in months ago and its a conspiracy of silence.

FFS indeed.
 
I guess it is possible that one person could get a heads up, but another wouldn't because of them being on air so often?
Surely the truth, as often happens, is in the middle. Perhaps City have not had the official statement which is still being written but someone has tipped them the nod. Perhaps the PL also don’t have the official decision but still want to get shot of Masters.
 
Along with every one else, I am desperate for this to be true.

What doesn't fit right with me is the issue of leaks. I can certainly get my head round that nothing leaks from the panel - they are used to the need for secrecy - even their staff will be used to not leaking.

But then you stretch to a few top people at CITY and the PL - again I can (just about) get my head around nothing leaking - CITY playing the long game and Masters not wanting to be outed.

But when you start going to executive research companies then I cannot see that becomes credible - there will be a few candidates - they all have family and friends - all of a sudden the people that know Masters is to be replaced become scores - and once his departure is leaked then the rest falls into place.
It’s amazing where these sort of leaks come from. The MPs expenses scandal started with a leak from a disgruntled office cleaner.
 
Lets work on the basis that I have no information and am completely wrong.

What plausible explanation can anyone offer as to how despite the release of the decision months ago, the only person in the whole of the World with any sort of platform that has been informed of this incredible story is on Bluemoon. It has not leaked anywhere else, it is not rumoured in any column, not by any club, not by any journalist, not in any DM I have ever received etc etc. How is the one person with this EXPLOSIVE story, PB.

And no, that doesn't apply to my "nobody knows yet". Nobody knows yet is the commonly held view across all clubs, all journalists, all people around the Bar, all people in the sports disputes world. So, if true PB, is sitting on a global exclusive.

How has this incredible story remained so secret but slipped out just the once and into the hands of PB. What an incredible turn of events.
 
I thought that was just talking about notification to Rosen and the two parties?

And, presumably, it being an arbitration, if the two parties wanted to hold up publication the panel would be favourable? I thought you had suggested that earlier in terms of timing?
Rule X is not the same as Rule W ie this is Disciplinary and not APT like arbitration. It has to be released. Rule X stuff doesn't
 
Politics internal and external always has its influence in these sort of hearings. Both sides get a chance to have their ducks in a row and the Government will be in the loop. It’s very different to a criminal hearing where the judge totally controls the timing. I suspect your summary is very close to the truth.
I hope Prestwich is right.
Amateur Geek 1 Pro Geek 0.
Sorry boys, just joshing.
 
Come on ffs Stefan.

Let’s say you were on pints terms with “top top top” figures - I’m thinking Khaldoon, Masters, someone from the panel - the last person they’re going to tell anything of this importance to is the guy who goes on Talksport to answer questions on this very topic. The guy who could literally have a slip of the tongue, show some particularly obvious body language etc that basically gives the game away.

You’re literally the last person they would tell.
YpkrW0VKWAAX97zmGJ.gif
 
Unless it’s already been mentioned,could it be that the decision hasn’t been released but the premier league for whatever reason had previously asked for it too be withheld for an extra few months anyhow..
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top