Not at all. It’s not real. It’s all an act for clicks. You can’t believe it’s genuine??The head case needs anger management and probably a psychiatrist.
Not at all. It’s not real. It’s all an act for clicks. You can’t believe it’s genuine??The head case needs anger management and probably a psychiatrist.
He could get a job in wrestling (if he wasn’t such a weedy fucker)Not at all. It’s not real. It’s all an act for clicks. You can’t believe it’s genuine??
They're rightIt’s funny reading Sad Cafe, some of them blame their demise on us, a convenient scapegoat for the poor performers, despite the fact they have spent lots of money, it’s all City’s fault for daring to compete
Correct. If he’s confident that what he is saying is true he is perfectly entitled to continue to do so, the fact he’s changed his tune alludes to the fact he knows it isn’tI don't see why we'd care if he has received a cease and desist, or if he reads it out - they aren't confidential documents, it will basically say if you continue to repeat unproven allegations as fact we will take you to court. As we should.
I'd have sent them long ago, far and wide. You can talk about the "115" all you want, you cannot talk like you know that it is or will be proven.
Absolutely, enough of this BBC licence fee bollocks. And enough of this Goldfinch, or whatever he's called bollocks.Mods, is it possible we can fuck right off (ban from posting) any member that doesn't post anything of relevance to the actual thread subject, cos it's now starting to do my fuckin head in, cheers in advance.
The first thing he needs is a pair of trousers.The head case needs anger management and probably a psychiatrist.
Anyone faced with rag cretins like this, just remind them they're under investigation by HMRC over image rights payments to players.
The allegation is that they've overpaid these, which reduced their corporate tax & NI liabilities as the players themselves are personally liable to these. I'm told that HMRC are claiming a sum of somewhere in the region of £100m from them over these payments. That's potentially tax evasion.
If HMRC are right, then that means their expenses in the accounts will have been understated. I wonder if the PL will open an investigation, in the same way they're investigating our image rights payments via Fordham? Because they'll have done pretty well what we're accused of, which is presenting inaccurate accounts.
Nothing much but he is no longer saying City were found guilty by CAS because of non cooperation, he is also saying FFP is the problem, with no mention of City.Can someone bring me up to speed on what Simon Jordan has said? I’ve seen the gold bridge video
Goldenbollocks, or is that name taken alreadyAbsolutely, enough of this BBC licence fee bollocks. And enough of this Goldfinch, or whatever he's called bollocks.