PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

It's caused by the CAS decision being so poorly explained, 'journalists' either not understanding or downright misrepresenting. Creating 'outrage' stories where there are none, i.e. the choosing of the three people on the CAS panel.

People have then filled the gaps in with conspiracy theories, corruption, brown evelopes, etc.

Perhaps City should have corrected the lies and misinformation in these stories publicly?

Keeping quiet about it hasn't helped as City are still being accused and criticised over the CAS report.

It's going to be even worse if, as we all hope, we're exonerated.

I agree with the keeping quiet mate to be fair, we have allowed the media to tarnish the club and its reputation
 
I understand what you are saying.
But it does allow the rags to get down to work early which was why the gardening leave was agreed .
We didn't want them to get a jump on next season
At their level the period of notice to quit can be 6 months and more, the gardening leave is to keep them away from their current employers daily work as they (City in this case) are still contractually bound to pay him whatever is in the contract. He's obviously not supposed to start any work for whoever he's going to but given Scruffy Jim's comments about having had a grown up conversation with City then I can't see City complaining. City always seem to act with the utmost good faith to everybody, which makes some of the PL's charges amusing.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.