PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Big mals fedora]

Xmas is going to be tense in their gaff.

Would imagine his brother was quite tense at that monent

 

[christened at st marks]

 

[bluenova]

To be fair to the Premier League, where do you find a big accountancy firm that hasn't been complicit in fraud?

 

[Bluewonder]

“They’ve threatened to pull state funding out of the UK”
It’s not a threat it’s a promise.

It's also bullshit

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

These charges are preposterous, as anyone who has more than four active brain cells will fully appreciate.

Anyone who’s doesn’t is thick as fuck.

I think many do appreciate, but realise which way the wind is blowing in terms of revenue.

 

[Bluewonder]

Deloitte doesn't audit City, BDO does.

 

[norman]

These charges are preposterous, as anyone who has more than four active brain cells will fully appreciate.

Anyone who’s doesn’t is thick as fuck.

I think many do appreciate, but realise which way the wind is blowing in terms of revenue.

At the risk of outing myself as thick as fuck, I struggle with the notion that preposterous charges have been brought by the EPL who must have sought the advice of competent lawyers before they did so. Genuine question to you - do you believe the EPL lawyers are thick as fuck also, or is it the case that the charges were issued by the EPL against legal advice?
For what it’s worth I trust Khaldoon‘s irrefutable evidence statement but as I say it seems virtually unthinkable that any responsible organisation would issue proceedings of such magnitude knowing such proceedings were doomed to fail

 

[117 M34]

Deloitte doesn't audit City, BDO does.

There has been various auditors since the takeover I believe

 

[burning blue soul]

At the risk of outing myself as thick as fuck, I struggle with the notion that preposterous charges have been brought by the EPL who must have sought the advice of competent lawyers before they did so. Genuine question to you - do you believe the EPL lawyers are thick as fuck also, or is it the case that the charges were issued by the EPL against legal advice?
For what it’s worth I trust Khaldoon‘s irrefutable evidence statement but as I say it seems virtually unthinkable that any responsible organisation would issue proceedings of such magnitude knowing such proceedings were doomed to fail

The thing is, Norman, either City have carried out preposterous business practices over a decade, or the PLs charges are preposterous.
There is no middle ground.
One of the statements above must be false.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

At the risk of outing myself as thick as fuck, I struggle with the notion that preposterous charges have been brought by the EPL who must have sought the advice of competent lawyers before they did so. Genuine question to you - do you believe the EPL lawyers are thick as fuck also, or is it the case that the charges were issued by the EPL against legal advice?
For what it’s worth I trust Khaldoon‘s irrefutable evidence statement but as I say it seems virtually unthinkable that any responsible organisation would issue proceedings of such magnitude knowing such proceedings were doomed to fail

What if the charges were designed to just smear City? IE they (Like UEFA) know they will fail but the damage to the brand is the target.

Edit. So yes, against advice would be the implication. And from what I have heard from experts viewpoints - Why have the PL over reached themselves on this case so much

Of course that could all be bullshit if the PL do have something no one knows about.