PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

ayrshire_blue said:
I'm the opposite. If we're cleared I won't give a fuck what anyone says, but being cleared is the absolute must here. Some people will always hold their fucked up opinion but enough people on middle ground will have a change of attitude.
Click to expand...
I can’t think of one pundit on “middle ground” who will have a change of attitude if we are cleared. Did any after CAS?
 
mattcity5 said:
There's a "clear and obvious" way out for the PL which preserves the brand and makes them look decent regulators.

"Following the release of 6 or 7 edited emails out of over 3 million illegally obtained emails by a.hacker, there were legitimate concerns raised by PL members about how City were behaving.

We have spent a long time investigating these concerns and have raised them with City. As a result we can confirm that there are no issues, nothing untoward has been done and all rules have been followed. City have co-operated fully in our investigation, which will go no further, and we thank them for that co-operation."

Etc, etc "needed to check, very thorough investigation", etc
Click to expand...
Their chance to do this vanished when they announced 'charges'. They have basically said they have found evidence of guilt and passed it to a panel to pass judgement. The investigation is over.
If the panel doesn't agree with their conclusions, the only way they can save face is if we produce evidence to the panel that we withheld from the PL investigation.
If we then provide an explanation to the panel as to why we withheld evidence and the panel agree with us, the PL will be utterly fucked as a organisation with any integrity or competence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.