PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[lust overlord]

Rag? Why not check google maps to find out where Avenell Road is?

Typical rag excuse.

 

[Joe Corrigan's Superstitions]

Much as I'm loath to admit I read it, there has been a definite change in tone at the Daily Fail. This is from one of the recent articles about our dominance:
"...there is a shadow hanging over these triumphs in the shape of the 115 charges levelled against City by the Premier League, alleging financial breaches that happened before Guardiola came to the club but which, if proven, will stain these triumphs.

City’s case may be heard this winter. A verdict may be reached some time next year. They may be exonerated of all the charges."

The bits I've highlighted in bold weren't being written a month ago and the "may be exonerated of all charges" has appeared in more than one article. I think that phrase is significant because it never appeared before.

They're definitely back-peddling and I'm happy to believe that that is because they've been tipped off that we will be exonerated.

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

He said that Kenny fucking Rogers is a blue .

I fucking love Kenny Rogers

 

[Marklr]

Rag? Why not check google maps to find out where Avenell Road is?

There's probably more rags in the Highbury area than there is in the Old Trafford area, to be fair.

 

[Blumooniac]

The former, albeit, someone of such standing not to ignore!

Cheers, as always, for your input. Ignore any negativity. I remember the "Haaland says yessssss" post. Skipped to work and informed my colleagues. The rags lold. Ha.

 

[KS55]

This is the key point. The cast majority of these cases are settled before the hearing because evidence is disclosed in advance to the parties involved. Both sets of lawyers will almost certainly have a clear idea of the likely outcome by now.

In other words, there is no smoking gun.

 

[Marklr]

why not check google to find out what "tolmie " is too

A town in Australia! Fast, me.

 

[billblu]

Thanks and I guess a City player too?

There taking the piss mate nobody knows who he is or if he even exists a bit like that dude of the x files .

 

[supercity88]

I think we can successfully argue the non co-operation allegations precisely because of CAS.

My understanding is that CAS were annoyed with City because had City provided the evidence to UEFA that they presented at CAS then they believed UEFA would have no option but to find that there was no evidence of their allegations.

The Premier League had access to the full CAS report and the evidence provided by City.

Unless The Premier League have new evidence that they could make specific requests of City then all they have been doing is fishing. In my opinion, but I might be talking bollocks.

Our argument would be that they didn't need the information requested, but any involvement I have had in legal proceedings - quite different to this I should add - are that procedural requirements are black and white and if information is requested we should be providing it regardless of our thoughts on whether it is relevant. I'm sure there are added complexities here, probably interlinked to the club's desire to keep things out of the public domain, but I would still anticipate a non-cooperation charge of some sort. That could be a suspended charge on the basis we comply in the future.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Thanks and I guess a City player too?

Yes - Jim Tolmie .

Signed by Billy McNeil when manager at City.