Get your cot and leave this sec"The conversation was about judges,you just went off on a tangent. Cos it's a sine you are a prick so leave me alone, ta."
As i have said from the beginning if we have done what we are accused of doing i would fully expect to see HMRC knocking at the door.Isn’t this about pumping dodgy money into the accounts? The legal teams have an absolute responsibility to notify the relevant authorities of any possibility that they find.
Not sure what your angle is here, but you seem a bit obtuse about the whole thing!Get your cot and leave this sec
You sourcey devil.@Prestwich_Blue I've had a second source unconnected to my original source tell me that the broad outcome was clear 6 months ago, even if the formal verdict wasn't. Is the delay due to attempts at damage limitation? Are the departures of Levy & Lewis connected or coincidental?
Are you able to say what that broad outcome is?
Almost as though the end has to be justified by available means to prevent a legal challenge.There’s an interesting point where, if they decide that there is sufficient evidence that the PL have to turn this over to the UK regulatory bodies, rather than an independent panel, who are a lower court (not legal, just arbitrary rule makers), then it could also explain why it’s taking so long.
I've said it before, which is that the PL came out of it very badly, according to both.@Prestwich_Blue I've had a second source unconnected to my original source tell me that the broad outcome was clear 6 months ago, even if the formal verdict wasn't. Is the delay due to attempts at damage limitation? Are the departures of Levy & Lewis connected or coincidental?
Are you able to say what that broad outcome is?
The delay is probably linked to the fallout because either way its going to be biblical, at the very least people are going to lose jobs everywhere.I really don't get what the delay is over this bs. Are loose ends being finalised, are the prem league shitting it about making an announcement, we just need it putting to bed now
That's not a Chelsea themed straw.
writtenI imagine the delay is due to having to ensure that every single comma, full stop etc has to be in exactly the right place so the verdict is clear, unambiguous, and unchallengeable.
The old eats shoots and leaves thing.
I’ve probably put a comma in the wrong place now I’ve wrote that.
All depends on whether you believe the serial comma - a.k.a. Oxford comma - is correct usage or not. It derived from the printing industry in the Edwardian era so it’s debatable.I imagine the delay is due to having to ensure that every single comma, full stop etc has to be in exactly the right place so the verdict is clear, unambiguous, and unchallengeable.
The old eats shoots and leaves thing.
I’ve probably put a comma in the wrong place now I’ve wrote that.
Can’t see how the PL Board members who ignored their own legal advice in the APT case and ended up introducing unlawful rules can possibly survive. Brittain and Masters have to go. They have cost the member clubs millions ands that’s before the full legal costs are confirmed. A total disaster for the PL,The delay is probably linked to the fallout because either way its going to be biblical, at the very least people are going to lose jobs everywhere.
Thats just gibberish. You may as well write a² = b² + c² - 2bc cos A, that would make more sense."The conversation was about judges,you just went off on a tangent. Cos it's a sine you are a prick so leave me alone, ta."
I can find no reference to the 115, or to football in general, in the bible.The delay is probably linked to the fallout because either way its going to be biblical, at the very least people are going to lose jobs everywhere.
I do believe Arnold levy and Lewis all leaving their roles, does have a connection to the case. Arnold left a lot earlier. But I do believe Ratcliffe had something to do with thisI could be wrong but I find it difficult to believe that they'll write up all the proceedings completely dispassionately then say, "Right, what do we think? Proven or not proven?" for every single instance.
It's more likely they'll have pretty well made their minds up by the end of the hearing in most cases. There may be some debates about levels of proof, or the weight of some of the evidence and going back to the evidence presented, but there are only 3 substantive charges, plus the issue of non-cooperation, so it should be pretty clear to them whether the PL has made its case to a sufficient level of cogency by the end of the hearing.
I've had a second source unconnected to my original source tell me that the broad outcome was clear 6 months ago, even if the formal verdict wasn't. Is the delay due to attempts at damage limitation? Are the departures of Levy & Lewis connected or coincidental?
We'll find out soon hopefully.