So having weighed the evidence presented to you, you are now convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that City are innocent of all charges levelled against them.
Pretty much where I am too.
In a criminal court that would be enough for a jury. In fact it would be enough to not be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of our guilt, to be found not guilty. That is because of the presumption of innocence and onus of proof.
But there is no jury in this case except for the jury of public opinion, who already have us relegated without having heard the evidence.
I’m pretty much where you are Coats, but it’s hard to shake the niggling doubt that we may still be stitched up, although I know I’m just being paranoid.