LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
It’s what we do as Blues.Nice to see some humour in here.
It’s what we do as Blues.Nice to see some humour in here.
2088Is there a date set for when this is all sorted and we get a verdict?
the leeches have spent 1 billion on the team hardly pulling purse strings inYou heard it here first.
The punishment will be
Being sold to a family of American leeches that don't know you can play football without a helmet.
Having a stream of imbecilic managers, each one more inept than the past.
Having to pay four times the value of any player.
Having a fan base that despite all the evidence to the contrary, still think they are relevant.
They will not be happy times.
Surely you would have position the twins correctly otherwise you could have a case of one sucking your toes.Fucker, I’ve only just caught up and was going to say this lol. I was also going to reference those conjoined twins - co heads.
16 hands? But that's another taleThen you must have a dick the size of a horse.
Where there’s a will, there’s a waySurely you would have position the twins correctly otherwise you could have a case of one sucking your toes.
September 2025 at leastThink it’s looking increasingly unlikely that the decision will be announced in September.
They are still lining there own pockets nicelythe leeches have spent 1 billion on the team hardly pulling purse strings in
I don’t say this lightly either, but these supposedly senior guys at the premier league have told this to you but to nobody else, hence it’s not all over the media? I don’t think that’s realisticI don’t post this lightly, but having spent the last few days with a couple of people in very senior positions at the PL - they are certainly feeling very confident in their position.
You’d expect that, to a point - and clearly this would only be of note or concern if we are to assume either the result has landed with both City and the PL already ahead of publication, and they are therefore reflecting an informed view - or if, given its imminence, the relevant parties have an early impression of the broad direction the ruling is going to take.
On this - it’s worth reiterating that @slbsn has been pretty clear that he has been told, as of close of play on Friday, neither party had received the result - so I’m hoping he’s right on that, as in that context the views relayed to me could simply be evidence of a general level of bravado/confidence/arrogance on behalf of the PL ahead of publication, and not indicative of any specific knowledge.
It’s also worth saying that I don’t know these people well, so whilst certain comments definitely felt more indiscreet than others - they could also simply be holding an agreed/mandated company line or corporate position on the charges which don’t indicate anything of substance either way.
But I find this unlikely, as I’d expect the company line would be to say nothing - and to hold that they are waiting for the panel to arrive at its judgement before making any substantive comments on the situation.
That said, they were definitely very bullish in tone, and dismissed any view that City’s position on the charges held any credibility whatsoever.
I subscribed to your 115 updates some time agoYou have the Collected Poems of Philip Larkin in your bookcase don't you?
No just observations on some of these itk and nut jobs on here regarding 115Bad day?
Had a few posts on here similar to this style as of recent, whether it be from a city or PL POV. Obviously some have said they expect it soon, but the similar posts can definitely back this up.I don’t post this lightly, but having spent the last few days with a couple of people in very senior positions at the PL - they are certainly feeling very confident in their position.
You’d expect that, to a point - and clearly this would only be of note or concern if we are to assume either the result has landed with both City and the PL already ahead of publication, and they are therefore reflecting an informed view - or if, given its imminence, the relevant parties have an early impression of the broad direction the ruling is going to take.
On this - it’s worth reiterating that @slbsn has been pretty clear that he has been told, as of close of play on Friday, neither party had received the result - so I’m hoping he’s right on that, as in that context the views relayed to me could simply be evidence of a general level of bravado/confidence/arrogance on behalf of the PL ahead of publication, and not indicative of any specific knowledge.
It’s also worth saying that I don’t know these people well, so whilst certain comments definitely felt more indiscreet than others - they could also simply be holding an agreed/mandated company line or corporate position on the charges which don’t indicate anything of substance either way.
But I find this unlikely, as I’d expect the company line would be to say nothing - and to hold that they are waiting for the panel to arrive at its judgement before making any substantive comments on the situation.
That said, they were definitely very bullish in tone, and dismissed any view that City’s position on the charges held any credibility whatsoever.
they take dividend thats how shares workThey are still lining there own pockets nicely
You are Joel Glazer and I claim my tennerthey take dividend thats how shares work
I don’t say this lightly either, but these supposedly senior guys at the premier league have told this to you but to nobody else, hence it’s not all over the media? I don’t think that’s realistic
No way has City’s position lacked credibility. If that was the case they would have sought a way out two years ago and not let the investigation go on like thisWhat?
Told me the PL were still very confident they would be proven right when the panel returned their judgement, and dismissed City’s position a lacking credibility?
It’s hardly a major scoop mate - and it’s hardly a front page exclusive.
It’s mostly interesting because it likely indicates the PL haven’t had the judgement yet - despite speculation to the contrary - which is why I posted it.
There was a young man called Dick Masters'They fuck you up, the Red Cartel/ They say they don't mean to, but they do./ They fill you with the charges THEY should have/ And add some extra, just for you..'
(with apologies to Larkin, Hull's answer to E J Thribb..)
Worthy of Edward Lear! And when Simon Armitage decides to step down, you are a shoo-in for Poet Laureate..There was a young man called Dick Masters
As a villain he tried to cast us
He took us to court
But we fought and fought
And soon he'll be seeking new pastures.