PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

NH (rightly imo) thinks he's rehashing old news as new evidence, and thinks his interpretation of the evidence is naive at best and ludicrous at worst. He wants to know what his experience is based on the fact that the hat fella thinks the emails will be enough to secure a guilty verdict when anyone close to the case and/or familiar with how these things work are adamant they won't be.
It's ironic, though, that NH is taking umbrage with someone who is unqualified to comment on financial and legal matters, given that's been his MO for at least a decade now.
 
Did he get challenged on why why the PL Lawyers think this is the case?

Maybe…just maybe, because there is no compelling or substantive evidence that would stand up to any reasonable scrutiny, certainly not in the face of a body if irrefutable evidence?

Lol.

He looks like someone who’s just gone and bought a big f*ckoff spade and is trying to pretend it’s because he’s an archaeologist…
Sort of actually. He thinks City are refusing to hand over evidence, and the PL are fucked without it. The counter is that City aren't refusing to hand it over, it simply doesn't exist.

Either NH does have links to the PL lawyers, in which case this all very positive noises OR he's lying about that and feeling pretty negative about the whole thing. Win/win in some ways.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.