PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[ComfySeats]

Main tv news?

no the website

Standard Chartered: UK bank accused of helping to fund terrorists

Standard Chartered carried out billions of dollars of transactions for terrorist funders, US court papers claim.

www.bbc.co.uk

I have only read the headline as that's what fans of other clubs do. no point reading anything else my confirmation bias kicked in and it proves liverpool are sponsored by a bank that funds terrorism. They needs expelling from the premier league, stripped of any trophies won in the last 100 years, the ground needs to be reduced to ashes and any mention of the club going forward will result in a 65 year prison sentence to be served in a work camp in North Korea. If this isn't reasonable I dont know what is.

 

[Gremlin]

Bajkowski admits he is not a City fan so expect nothing less from the rag twat.

Stuart Brennan wasn't a City fan but still managed to do a decent and objective job, by and large.

 

[laserblue]

Explosive stuff, literally. Harris should be all over this.

The only explosive stuff Harris is involved with is explosive diarrhoea.

 

[Gone for a Burton]

And those scouse bastards accuse us of sportswashing. Better being a sportwashing club than one that advertises a terrorist funding, money laundering, sanctions breaking bank on their shirts.

Why is this not on all media news loops.

The werlds greatest football club,formerly bankrolled by a 1950s gambling company and supported by the werlds greatest supporters, sponsored by the werlds greatest terrorist supporting American Bank.

Shirley the public should be able to share this news.

Ps....praps this is the real reason that the highly principled Klopp jumped ship ??

 

[laserblue]

Commentator said during the Tottenham match that City were able to bring a world class keeper off the bench.
Probably nailed on that the same commentator couldn't have named Stefan Ortega or his club 2 years ago.

He's probably unaware that City picked up Ortega on a free transfer from Arminia Bielefeld after they'd been relegated from the Bundesliga. Who knew world class keepers could be picked up for nothing from crap teams?

 

[halfcenturyup]

Apologies if this had already been commented on but couldnt see it anywhere - but I see Bajkowski has written a snide piece in the MEN quoting Dr Dan Plumley and a guilty verdict is due next year that will shock football.

Bajkowski is on the City beat, at the press conferences etc yet still writes this type of crap. Plumley seems to get wheeled out whenever they are looking for snide comments of City from a financial perspective.

That's classic. Dr Dan Plumley the great football finance expert in an interview with instantcasinos.com (yes, really) said this:



I can see three things wrong with just that one paragraph. First, there are no rumours of penalties, there are possible penalties at the panel's discretion. Secondly, the number of allegations has no bearing at all on how serious they are or not. Thirdly, "significant penalties" if "any of" the allegations are proven. Really.

What is it about Sheffield Hallam that vomits up so many football finance experts, all of a sudden?

 

[BlueRockape]

That's classic. Dr Dan Plumley the great football finance expert in an interview with instantcasinos.com (yes, really) said this:

View attachment 121168

I can see three things wrong with just that one paragraph. First, there are no rumours of penalties, there are possible penalties at the panel's discretion. Secondly, the number of allegations has no bearing at all on how serious they are or not. Thirdly, "significant penalties" if "any of" the allegations are proven. Really.

What is it about Sheffield Hallam that vomits up so many football finance experts, all of a sudden?

Plum by name

 

[halfcenturyup]

Plum by name

And without being snobby, he is a fucking management accountant. He should stay in his lane.

 

[Centurions]

That's classic. Dr Dan Plumley the great football finance expert in an interview with instantcasinos.com (yes, really) said this:

View attachment 121168

I can see three things wrong with just that one paragraph. First, there are no rumours of penalties, there are possible penalties at the panel's discretion. Secondly, the number of allegations has no bearing at all on how serious they are or not. Thirdly, "significant penalties" if "any of" the allegations are proven. Really.

What is it about Sheffield Hallam that vomits up so many football finance experts, all of a sudden?

Unconscious bias perhaps, they all want to impress the top dog so believe everything the boss says without trying to think for themselves.

Belief perseverance and the backfire effect is in plain sight every single day.

 

[Lord Blue]

Drop it over on RAWK to see how the cunts react.

well that's my standard response to dippers on twitter sorted for a while