burning blue soul
Well-Known Member
Let's hope we're always at fault, then :)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
the plasterer
Well-Known Member
And a tight **** when it comes to payingHe is slimy.
Been saying this all along, they dont have anything and never have had anything, this whole thing has been a massive diversionary tactic from day one by the red tops and their yank owners, its yank business 101 when you cant compete you litigate, we are taking food off their table, their fans are mad because they arent where there entitled little brains tell them they should be and it cant be because city are better run and more inventive it just cant because the red tops are special, they have history so we must have cheated we must have and this is why they need to tarnish our club because to them IF we havent cheated (which we havent by the way) then it is absolute proof that they are NOT special, that ANYBODY could do exactly the same as them and that would rock their belief system to their very core.It's City's fault for being too good.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Get off your horse and drink your milk?
The hell I will.
the pl is damaged beyond repair at this point, they need to get masters out and stop the tail wagging the dog, they are destroying the product at the behest of 3 clubs and its under masters watch, this seems to be what people dont get , city arent asking for anything other than fairness and all clubs to treated the same way and that is somehow seen as a bad thing and the only teams it is bad for is the red tops because for them fairness is them getting what they want and everyone else can fuck off.City claimed that the panel that brought the 115 charges was biased. Any emails between the PL and the panel that supported that claim could be very damaging for the PL
It would be more damaging if there was any communication between the PL and the panel as to whether to charge City over particular allegations. Any suggestion that the panel was encouraged to charge City, even if the evidence wasn’t compelling, would undermine the PLMaybe the discovery request is to ensure we can prove ( beyond reasonable doubt ) our defence against the charge of non-cooperation with the PL? In particular their requests for further information which we consider business sensitive!
If there is evidence of the PL sharing confidential information with our competitors it fully justifies our refusal to co-operate beyond a certain point?
CTID
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
I think you’ll find that certain clubs have been doing a lot more than just asking the PL about the investigation. Namely, pretty much forcing the PL to bring the charges in the first place.It isn't illegal for another club to lobby the PL, asking what is happening with the investigation, etc. It's a dick move, but not illegal.
It's possible but I doubt that any evidence of collusion and corruption will be found.
Just as there is no evidence of fraud in our own emails.
And would pave the way to a later claim by City against the PL for damages.Maybe the discovery request is to ensure we can prove ( beyond reasonable doubt ) our defence against the charge of non-cooperation with the PL? In particular their requests for further information which we consider business sensitive!
If there is evidence of the PL sharing confidential information with our competitors it fully justifies our refusal to co-operate beyond a certain point?
CTID
Imagine the piss-boil if we end up being cleared of all charges and the PL have to compensate us.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,564
the pl is damaged beyond repair at this point, they need to get masters out and stop the tail wagging the dog, they are destroying the product at the behest of 3 clubs and its under masters watch, this seems to be what people dont get , city arent asking for anything other than fairness and all clubs to treated the same way and that is somehow seen as a bad thing and the only teams it is bad for is the red tops because for them fairness is them getting what they want and everyone else can fuck off.
The tip off may have come from the premier league itself. If the board realises the damage Masters has done & need a fall guy they may have just hung him out to dry.