Who triggered this investigation anyway?
City by juggling the figure keep up
Who triggered this investigation anyway?
The directors could have a go, but I think the strongest defamatory remark is the one I've highlighted below - this alleges that "The owner" paid something, and - going off what Prestwich Blue posted earlier today - the payment can be distinguished in law as coming from the sponsor:-Unbelievable that the Mail has published this story from a discredited source like Leterme. As the publisher they have left themselves wide open to being sued by City for defamation. In fact the Mail could face multiple actions from different Directors at City. Not naming them doesn't provide any protection. If City do sue them then the onus is on the Daily Mail to prove that fraud has taken place...good luck with that one. It's an open goal and I really hope that this time City decide to kick the ball into the net. The timing would be perfect to lay down a marker with the media at the start of what is going to be a long and damaging process.
For those who think he’s going to be impartial, fuck right off. A fucking Arsenal fan as pretty much going to decide our fate.City can't be happy about the arsenal fan Murray Rosen KC appointed as head of the "independent commission" can they? He was obviously appointed before we were even charged, that doesn't scream independent or correct due process to me.
Lol endgame ?
I think you are onto something here, breach 015 - piss on the toilet seat in the loos on Colin Bell level 1 is entirely on me. I cannot see that the club should be punished for my misdirection.This is the worst breach i thought.
I mean this really saddened me, i'm really thinking about jacking footy in altogether after learning this.
The rage. The lies. The pulling of wool over the eyes. The deceit. The absolute bare faced cheek.
This is the one that has made me question my involvement with the club.
View attachment 68382
So Arsenal FC's lawyers will be presenting a case to an Arsenal FC season ticket-holder which could directly benefit Arsenal FC?
Endgame? People are going off the deep end. I can't imagine the Sheikh letting everything fall by the wayside over this nonsense. I think its just another way for the jealous fucking cowards in the Prem to break our balls and harm our brand. Sometimes being exonerated isn't enough. I would clear my name and then go on the offensive for slander and such...JMOEndgame?
"Endgame" was 1998. "Endgame" was 2008. We survived those. We are much too big to be fully taken down now, too many invested parties interested in our continued success. All the PL have done is exposed their flies at us. We should give them a swift kicking.
This is not a criminal trial so there is no legal risk other than defamation. But the main headline on the article states: "UEFA's Chief Investigator says he is convinced Man City have committed fraud." As the publisher the Mail can't hide behind the fact they are quoting someone else. They have published it and to make matters worse they make no attempt to balance the story. The story is as libellous as it gets. There are several other defamatory pharases including one which impunes the integrity of the CAS judges. It is a slam dunk for any competent libel lawyer.I'm not sure how all this is allowed, I don't think it would be in a legal trial as it could influence the decision.
Apparently we are being represented by Blackstone Chambers who were recently voted the best law firm in The UK.Premier League lawyers are Bird and Bird?
You mean the same lawyers as Arsenal's...
City can't be happy about the arsenal fan Murray Rosen KC appointed as head of the "independent commission" can they? He was obviously appointed before we were even charged, that doesn't scream independent or correct due process to me.