PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Unless I'm missing something the biggest take away is that the independent commission aren't afraid to side against the PL. Which is hopefully a good sign.

As for the approach LCFC used to defeat the charges, it would still be described as City getting off on a technicality again, if City attempted to use it for for the Mancini payment or the false accounting accusations. So I'd rather that be last resort after proving: No related parties paid any of the sponsorship money after all. Mancini did provide the services he was paid for to a club in the UAE and there was no reason this should have gone on Manchester City's accounts. Have at it with the non-cooperation bollocks though.
 
Well, well.

I'll tell you what. After the refusal of the clubs to change the rules following Chelsea's hotel nonsense, and after this, if the tribunal rules at all in favour of City on the APT case and the PL is found to have applied illegal rules and has to change them it would be an embarrassment to the PL like never before. The APT verdict suddenly becomes very important.

How is that "looking tough" to hold back an independent regulator looking now, Mr Masters?

What a mess.

Added to the fact the generous allowances given to he Rags underlines corruption.

Clubs charged up to now Leicester, Everton, Forest & City & none have yank ownership. Curious & curiouser!
 
Added to the fact the generous allowances given to he Rags underlines corruption.

Clubs charged up to now Leicester, Everton, Forest & City & none have yank ownership. Curious & curiouser!
And all have or had owners willing to invest, potentially pushing the red cunts plus spurs further behind.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.