cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 9,758
There does seem to be a pattern.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
There does seem to be a pattern.
Leicester - Thai OwnersThere does seem to be a pattern.
Everton - iranian Owners
Nottingham forest - Greek owners
Us - Abu dhabi owners
Four clubs charged and not a single american owner among them despite 50% of the league being under yank ownership.
So PL tell me you're racist without telling me you're racist.
NDA? If I were him, I would refuse one, and take my chances with a book deal to blow the lid off everything, by disclosing all the corruption that he has been put up to.Masters will be long gone, with an NDA in the bag, before there’s any chance for an enquiry. If/when we are cleared his position will be completely untenable.
It’s telling that no-one in the press appears to have raised this turn of event as a possibility, or moreover asked it of him directly.
I'm sure certain clubs would pay a whole lot more for his silence than the PL would pay in some sort of termination settlement.
Chelsea?Leicester - Thai Owners
Everton - iranian Owners
Nottingham forest - Greek owners
Us - Abu dhabi owners
Four clubs charged and not a single american owner among them despite 50% of the league being under yank ownership.
So PL tell me you're racist without telling me you're racist.
Kippax Street 1880
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 4,657
Well done Leicester. Rip it apart. And if you do it exploiting loopholes and making them look fucking stupid all the better.
Chelsea?
There is an investigation but as far as I am aware there are no charges, yet.
No charges yet and they approved that minor loophole of selling their own stuff to themselves while saying that no revenue from co-op live could count towards usChelsea?
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
We can’t count coop live? When did that happen? Seems we are banned from generating any money that counts.No charges yet and they approved that minor loophole of selling their own stuff to themselves while saying that no revenue from co-op live could count towards us
The PL is not fit for purpose.
But they are being investigated, and likely to face charges for cooking the books - which they have already confessed to.No charges yet and they approved that minor loophole of selling their own stuff to themselves while saying that no revenue from co-op live could count towards us
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
I guarantee that whoever loses this case will be “surprised and disappointed”