PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[BerkshireBlue]

They likely are time barred

I disagree. All the premier league needs to get around the 6 years limitation period is a new email or document saying something strange about the contracts they they didnt know about before. They might have that since they have pretty much all our documents. That will give the PL the door to try and prove whatever they are suggesting but proving it to a high bar might not be possible for them anyway. I've got little hope of anything being time barred for this case apart from the Fordham stuff.

 

[Winchester]

Sorry to sound a bit thick
But does Leciester' s Conclusion put us in a good position too??
Just a Yes or No will do
No need to be sarcy or Cryptic
( I know the 115 is still awaiting )
Thanks

 

[Mr Ed (The Stables)]

I disagree. All the premier league needs to get around the 6 years limitation period is a new email or document saying something strange about the contracts they they didnt know about before. They might have that since they have pretty much all our documents. That will give the PL the door to try and prove whatever they are suggesting but proving it to a high bar might not be possible for them anyway. I've got little hope of anything being time barred for this case apart from the Fordham stuff.

Surely the Premier League will at this stage have given full disclosure to City. Only our legal eagles will know whether they could add late evidence into the pot as you suggest.

I'm a layman and don't know.

 

[eyalluvitt]

They likely are time barred

Mancini? Sorry PL, never heard of him

 

[Lord Blue]

My views have not changed. But everyone should be aware of the risk in any case. I have said this over and over. Don't be too certain about anything.

that's good enough for me, i'm booking a tattoo

 

[halfcenturyup]

I disagree. All the premier league needs to get around the 6 years limitation period is a new email or document saying something strange about the contracts they they didnt know about before. They might have that since they have pretty much all our documents. That will give the PL the door to try and prove whatever they are suggesting but proving it to a high bar might not be possible for them anyway. I've got little hope of anything being time barred for this case apart from the Fordham stuff.

On what grounds will the PL be able to remove the limitation on the Mancini issue?

 

[jrb]

There's no way of getting away from 115.

 

[NZBlue]

There's no way of getting away from 115.

...and it's blue and white

 

[journolud]

Sorry to sound a bit thick
But does Leciester' s Conclusion put us in a good position too??
Just a Yes or No will do
No need to be sarcy or Cryptic
( I know the 115 is still awaiting )
Thanks

Yes and no

 

[Stoned Rose]

I disagree. All the premier league needs to get around the 6 years limitation period is a new email or document saying something strange about the contracts they they didnt know about before. They might have that since they have pretty much all our documents. That will give the PL the door to try and prove whatever they are suggesting but proving it to a high bar might not be possible for them anyway. I've got little hope of anything being time barred for this case apart from the Fordham stuff.

Doesn’t work like that mate.