PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Giovinco]

Plenty of Dippers and Rags on Twitter declaring the fact that they have inside information confirming our guilt - strange how this lot have access to information that even the PL and City don’t know exists.

I think their denial is a strong coping mechanism

They can’t believe we’re that good so have to rationalize it with bull shit

 

[vincent]

Plenty of Dippers and Rags on Twitter declaring the fact that they have inside information confirming our guilt - strange how this lot have access to information that even the PL and City don’t know exists.

They’re absolutely obsessed with liccle City. Proper mard arses. Greatest team the premier league has ever seen and they simply can’t handle it.

 

[dadnlad]

They’re absolutely obsessed with liccle City. Proper mard arses. Greatest team the premier league has ever seen and they simply didn't sign up for it

Sorted last bit for you

 

[salfordbluetrue]

Has there been any updates today?

Not been on for a few days, so sorry if it has already been said, and put to bed but. Leicester City won their case on Thursday, while it is more like the Everton case than ours, it dropped a bomb on the PL. The PL biult an independent panel to look at their case, they chose not to look at all the evidence or dismissed it, which they can, just like our independent panel, the evidence was sufficient to appeal, where they won. This puts severe pressure on our panel, Precedence, Procedure, Terminology, so while the media claim it is just a loophole, which it maybe.
The Leicester CEO said they had "simply sought to ensure that the rules are applied based on how they are actually written".
Our lawyers will be wetting themselves with laughter, for example SB was on Talksport doing the reasoning for the Leicester case, and he raised the Mancini charges being nothing like the rules 2009 to 2013, which he stated were ` You need a contract with your manager, that was filled within 7 days`.
So while we have done nothing Leicester City may well have given the panel an excuse ( if they want it ) to drop all charges?

 

[eyalluvitt]

Plenty of Dippers and Rags on Twitter declaring the fact that they have inside information confirming our guilt - strange how this lot have access to information that even the PL and City don’t know exists.

The DipRag Time Barred Bandits need to take a day off

 

[Blueboy73]

Plenty of Dippers and Rags on Twitter declaring the fact that they have inside information confirming our guilt - strange how this lot have access to information that even the PL and City don’t know exists.

It's also amazing how many Rag and Dipper keyboard warriors are qualified accountants and solicitors specialising in sport too.

 

[Big Joe Corrigan]

Plenty of Dippers and Rags on Twitter declaring the fact that they have inside information confirming our guilt - strange how this lot have access to information that even the PL and City don’t know exists.

Maybe they hacked into the PL database, it’s not as if they haven’t done similar before.

 

[Giovinco]

I was re-reading the statement from city which they released after the PL announced the charges.

What I don’t understand is that there was wp extensive dialogue between the club and the PL.

Not been on for a few days, so sorry if it has already been said, and put to bed but. Leicester City won their case on Thursday, while it is more like the Everton case than ours, it dropped a bomb on the PL. The PL biult an independent panel to look at their case, they chose not to look at all the evidence or dismissed it, which they can, just like our independent panel, the evidence was sufficient to appeal, where they won. This puts severe pressure on our panel, Precedence, Procedure, Terminology, so while the media claim it is just a loophole, which it maybe.
The Leicester CEO said they had "simply sought to ensure that the rules are applied based on how they are actually written".
Our lawyers will be wetting themselves with laughter, for example SB was on Talksport doing the reasoning for the Leicester case, and he raised the Mancini charges being nothing like the rules 2009 to 2013, which he stated were ` You need a contract with your manager, that was filled within 7 days`.
So while we have done nothing Leicester City may well have given the panel an excuse ( if they want it ) to drop all charges?

Cheers salfordblue.

 

[homerdog]

How?

 

[dickie davies]

Is that Terry Flowers? If so I came across him when we both worked for Barclays about 10 years ago. Think he was a Business Development manager out in Essex and I was doing work with the Business Banking division. He's now done a Goldbridge and gone full-time as an 'influencer' but at least he's a genuine red, albeit a southern one.

Is there anybody you haven’t fucking worked for?