Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,333
They haven’t been so far and there’s nothing in the public domain to make anyone believe that they will be this time either.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Winchester
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2020
- Messages
- 2,678
- Team supported
- Mcfc
Correct m8
Some people who post on here think they are comedians with their replies
The First Earl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 367
Do not panic my friend. Trust in Khaldoon, he hasn’t let us down yet, and I’d rather trust what he says against some other gobshite journalist.
Stay calm, it’ll be over soon.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,873
From the CAS award:
Unlikely the panel will conclude any different.
But why are you reading shit on Twitter if you are of a nervous disposition?
Winchester
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2020
- Messages
- 2,678
- Team supported
- Mcfc
How do you know he was reading on Twitter?
He has a genuine Concern for City as we all have
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,873
And I quote:
"Mad hat still going on and on and on now he is talking down Stefan , tell me is it not correct that email will not be enough for the panel to find City guilty.
slbsn Prestwich_Blue tell me if I am wrong, emails are not enough to find City guilty of the main charges."
Last edited:
Winchester
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2020
- Messages
- 2,678
- Team supported
- Mcfc
He doesn't deserve to get some crap like he did in the first reply he recieved
Quote on....
I thought Nick had some kind of mental breakdown, poor chap
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,873
I accept your apology. Not sure why you have a problem with me, I didn't write the reply you are talking about.
But listen. We are 6,500 pages into this thread, both slbsn and Prestwich_Blue, and pretty much everyone else who knows what they are talking about, have said consistently that the PL will need more than just emails to prove their allegations to the required standard of proof, together with the legal considerations around cogency of evidence and the conclusions of the CAS panel on the subject. The guy has clearly been following the thread because he knows who to ask. If he believes the people on here that is fine but then he shouldn't be impressed by some anonymous **** ranting on Twitter. If he doesn't believe them that is fine too, but then there isn't much point asking for their opinion again.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Struck a nerve have I ?
"Why are you reading Nick Harris" hardly constitutes being uncivil, unless the poster has never heard of him, then I`m amazed as his name crops up on a daily basis.
Perhaps we should stop being uncivil to Harris ?