That date has been claimed since before the start of the season, they are only 'breaking' it now for maximum effect and reheated headlines.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
That date has been claimed since before the start of the season, they are only 'breaking' it now for maximum effect and reheated headlines.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Exactly mate. You nailed it in one sentence.The PL won't charge Utd as Utd approved the appointment of Richard Masters. Yep, nothing to see here.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
And to nullify the news of the rags losses.That date has been claimed since before the start of the season, they are only 'breaking' it now for maximum effect and reheated headlines.
Start date is September 16th, expected to last 10-12 weeks, that puts the end date end of November/December. Another month or 6 weeks to reach and write a judgment puts the announcement around new years. Even give them an extra month or 2 and we’re talking about end of Feb.
Stefans been fairly certain there’ll be no appeal likely because of the rules, so I can’t see a situation where the table in April is relevant. If we lose the punishment will be so severe that we’re instantly out of any title race regardless of an appeal, if we win then obviously it’s not an issue.
Given that Everton and Forrest both appealed and Leicester won their appeal, and many outlets expect us to appeal when discussing timescales, we cam safely say that stefan was wrong with his certainty on that one.
blue for life
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 2,437
Bound to be questions from the media scum today at the presser but Pep will take it in his stride. He’s got their number.
Champions again in 2012
Well-Known Member
It will be funny as feck If Pep says "but what about yernited"Bound to be questions from the media scum today at the presser but Pep will take it in his stride. He’s got their number.
Toney’s bookie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 1,712
Given that Everton and Forrest both appealed and Leicester won their appeal, and many outlets expect us to appeal when discussing timescales, we cam safely say that stefan was wrong with his certainty on that one.
Was Stefan's point that we couldn't appeal to someone else eg CAS or a proper court. It all has to be done via the Premier League
Yes and that’s the worry.Was Stefan's point that we couldn't appeal to someone else eg CAS or a proper court. It all has to be done via the Premier League
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,828
Another hatchet job by Sky Sports, big article about the charges, heavily slanted to assuming we are guilty. Nothing whatsoever mentioned about what if we are innocent.
Given that Everton and Forrest both appealed and Leicester won their appeal, and many outlets expect us to appeal when discussing timescales, we cam safely say that stefan was wrong with his certainty on that one.
Didn’t they appeal the actual sentence though and not the findings/judgement of the panel?