PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[richards30]

Pep looked uncomfortable when asked about it today. And the “we’ll accept the sentence” comment was a bit weird

I`m hoping that was just the way he explained it to be honest as i thought the same

 

[oakiecokie]

City are now entering their 14th consecutive season in the Champions league. During that time utd have qualified 9 times, Liverpool and Arsenal will be 8 times, Chelsea 10 and Spurs 5 times.

City have also won 17 domestic trophies, not including Charity Shield, since our FA cup win in 2011. The rest of the so called top 6 have only managed 19 domestic trophies between them. Chelsea, Liverpool and utd with 5 each, Arsenal with 4 and Spurs with fuck all.

As long as the MSM and other fans are able to console themselves that we must have cheated then there can be no other reason for our lengthy period of sustained success.

Not much mention of the trophies won under Pep post 2018 which are outside the period of time that the alleged charges are contained within.

It’s an awful lot of money and trophies that City have prevented the others from sharing.

Ahhh bless `em !!

 

[Ric]

The one "chink in the amor" re Ethihad is "Pearcegate". The Twat-Harris and Panja etc have repeatedly accused him of perjury at CAS in relation to the question "Did you ever arrange payments on behalf HHSM to disgusie equity funding as sponsorship by Etihad Airways". We were told in CAS2020 that Simon Pearce answered "Categorically Not", and that was the end of it.
Since CAS2020 the Twat et al have relied on a gross misrepresentation of an email where Pearce is arranging payments but NOT from HHSM. I look forward to this issue being resolved 100% by the IC. I anticipate it will take more than "Categorically Not" to do so. Once this accusation has been resolved for ever the likes of Twat-Harris and Panja will have to spend a few more years of their lives scrutinising legacy emails in desperation.

@slbsn has addressed this on Twitter just now:

 

[chaddblue]

Pep looked uncomfortable when asked about it today. And the “we’ll accept the sentence” comment was a bit weird

He's said that many times before

I get the impression he's biting his tongue as he wants to shout from the rooftops that we're gonna wipe the floor with them... but he's been told to say nothing

 

[Jam Tomorrow]

If I was Pep I would remind the baying mob of hacks that before our case was even heard by CAS in 2020, nine premier league clubs wrote to CAS to insist we were guilty before we had a chance to prove our innocence which of course we did. The idea we have been treated objectively is a lie. A big one at that.

 

[I'm Blue]

And will be sponsored by the number 115

*disclaimer
Any sponsorship money did not come from Sheikh Mansour ; )

 

[Ric]

Pep looked uncomfortable when asked about it today. And the “we’ll accept the sentence” comment was a bit weird

I don't think he looked uncomfortable personally, more like he's just tired of answering the same bullshit questions.

 

[Norbiton]

Pep looked uncomfortable when asked about it today. And the “we’ll accept the sentence” comment was a bit weird

Pep’s English is good but not perfect. I think he might well have meant verdict rather than sentence. Or he was just winding them up.

 

[oakiecokie]

@slbsn has addressed this on Twitter just now:

Sorry Stefan but I strongly object to a word you used. They are NOT Twitterers. The correct spelling should read TWATTERERS.
Keep up the good work mate. ;)

 

[slbsn]

I don't think he looked uncomfortable personally, more like he's just tired of answering the same bullshit questions.

He clearly meant the decision.

But he did seem to inadvertently confirm Monday...