PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Just seen him talking now.
Surprised by his reaction to it all, I'd expect him to be a bit more bullish and have a bit of faith in the process.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
as would be expected they omitted the final part of his concluding sentence on the SSN clip
"To have the possibility of that being tarnished is really sad (SSN end quote here) but we will see what happens We may find that they are not guilty of these things."
Unfortunately, I just don't buy it. I can't even see City trying to claw back legal fees
I genuinely think the club would be happy that it's over and finally able to operate in relative peace
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Well what a surprise the edited it like they did.
Fuckin rats.
What on earth is M Ogadon on about?
The Football Leaks material formed the basis of UEFA's action against City, but after finding the club guilty and imposing a two-year Champions League ban, UEFA's decision was then overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) because the alleged offences were "time-barred" by UEFA's five-year statute of limitations.
www.espn.com
The Football Leaks material formed the basis of UEFA's action against City, but after finding the club guilty and imposing a two-year Champions League ban, UEFA's decision was then overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) because the alleged offences were "time-barred" by UEFA's five-year statute of limitations.
Man City vs. Premier League: 115 charges, but what's at stake?
The hearing into Man City's 115 alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules begins Monday, and the ramifications could be huge.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Bitter utd fan Ogden?What on earth is M Ogadon on about?
The Football Leaks material formed the basis of UEFA's action against City, but after finding the club guilty and imposing a two-year Champions League ban, UEFA's decision was then overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) because the alleged offences were "time-barred" by UEFA's five-year statute of limitations.
Man City vs. Premier League: 115 charges, but what's at stake?
The hearing into Man City's 115 alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules begins Monday, and the ramifications could be huge.
Can't for the life of me think what would make him write some shite like that about us.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
think thats why slbsn is more guarded on talksport, their just after sound bites for headline news
Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 29,259
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
Barm.
TheThirdDeano
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 8,768
All this because we got an owner who wanted to invest and build the best club he could.
Absolutely pathetic really.
Absolutely pathetic really.