Eric Hitchmough
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 2,846
That’s my gut feeling too. The ‘nuclear’ option would be one hell of a departure from the ‘holistic approach’ favoured by the club.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
paul power
Active Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 40
Daniel LevyWho dis?
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,065
Business as usual is not a £300m investment in extending the stadium & building a hotel.
Agree to disagree!
eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 7,801
- Team supported
- Manchester city
One of the time barred charges was the Etisalat deal and we even provided evidence and a witness to disprove UEFA 's claims against us on that one.I wouldn’t mind but they don’t even need to read the full report. Just the bit that says we didn’t use disguised equity funding for sponsorship payments. And even if any of the brain dead cunts were to accept that we won on ALL the non time-barred charges, what makes them think it would’ve been a different outcome on the time-barred ones?!
Of course we would. Isn't that what the parachute payments we will receive next year are for ?Exactly, there's no way we'd have gone ahead with that development if we knew we were getting the book thrown at us
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
It will happen if they throw the book at us.That’s my gut feeling too. The ‘nuclear’ option would be one hell of a departure from the ‘holistic approach’ favoured by the club.
Dubai Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 15,223
The reporting on this makes it sound like the 20 clubs will have to dip into their own bank accounts to pay the legal costs. In reality, it will just be deducted from the next tranche of TV money if the PL doesn't already have funds allocated for it.I hope City say we aren’t paying a share of legal costs for effectively prosecuting ourselves
And hopefully any club that wasn’t in the league at the time the charges were brought takes a leaf out of Leicester’s book and says they weren’t a PL club at the time so they aren’t either
Fanciful, but would be amusing
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
It’s because we have class. City are above tit for tat.This.
All this talk of “going nuclear” and throwing some big dossier of information on the table to sue/destroy everyone is ridiculous.
City will say/do fuck all and will simply crack on with world domination.
Not sure I’d describe Daniel Levy as “lanky”. He’s about 5ft 5”!Daniel Levy
Matt Diablo
Well-Known Member
Exactly. Nothings changed. Case is a sham. Easy peezy lemon squeezy. Inept corrupt mfsOne of the time barred charges was the Etisalat deal and we even provided evidence and a witness to disprove UEFA 's claims against us on that one.