PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I watched the original clip live and even with the last bit he made a tit of himself.

Said he was “worried” and using daft words like “tarnished”.

He should leave the emotion out of it as words like that only fuel the fire of those who want us wiped out.

“Oooh this ex-city chairman is shitting himself and thinks everything will be tarnished”. Reinforces their confirmation bias.

Should’ve just said city are adamant they’re innocent and have a body of irrefutable evidence and then shut his mouth.

For a man of his experience he’s naive as fuck.
Agree with you there mate. We have a lot to be grateful to him for, but he came across as green as fuck, and somewhat diffident, in that clip.
 
That’s @gordondaviesmoustache and his previous butler just after they attended the Cannes Film Festival.

A lovely do, by all accounts.
Haha! My girlfriend used to go there every year when she worked in advertising!

One big party by all accounts!
 
Remember when Stefan first appeared on talksport, he did pretty much read out the CAS verdict and align it to this case but all Jim White wanted to know was what punishment we get, they then put the headline out 'city financial expert says city will be relegated'.
When you notice all the media reports they all start with the allegations then lead onto possible punishment, not one report I have seen has gone into any sort of detail about the bit in the middle, the actual case itself.
I believe they are intelligent people and choose to ignore the CAS verdict and focus on clicks instead.

Their audience isn't intelligent and it's a world motivated by numbers not facts.

I had a mate message me saying we were guilty because of the Mancini payments, I said why would the club be worried about £2m when spunking £40m on Bony and Rodwell!

It's laughable people think they know the ins and outs of this. Experts like Stefan still don't know the full details, hence why he can't be so bullish as to say we are getting off the charges.
 
Unfortunately, I just don't buy it. I can't even see City trying to claw back legal fees

I genuinely think the club would be happy that it's over and finally able to operate in relative peace

This.

All this talk of “going nuclear” and throwing some big dossier of information on the table to sue/destroy everyone is ridiculous.

City will say/do fuck all and will simply crack on with world domination.
 
Me too as they have to work with these cunts whether they like it or not. They deserve nothing but contempt as you can't dress it up any other way, they are trying to put our club out of existence.
This is the problem. If we win, we won’t want to torch the Premier League to the ground because the main point of being a football club is to, err, play football matches.

Also, as I understand it the PL rules state that a club can’t sue another club. I’m not sure how set in stone that is but I’d have thought if we had clear evidence that other clubs and individuals at those clubs have tried to sabotage our club and business model then we may be able to take action another way, ie: through the courts. Not mentioning any names of course but a certain lanky bald-headed streak of piss working for a club in North London may well be having sleepless nights. After all, I doubt our manager would go around naming names if there wasn’t something concrete behind it.
 
I watched the original clip live and even with the last bit he made a tit of himself.

Said he was “worried” and using daft words like “tarnished”.

He should leave the emotion out of it as words like that only fuel the fire of those who want us wiped out.

“Oooh this ex-city chairman is shitting himself and thinks everything will be tarnished”. Reinforces their confirmation bias.

Should’ve just said city are adamant they’re innocent and have a body of irrefutable evidence and then shut his mouth.

For a man of his experience he’s naive as fuck.

Perhaps he meant worried as in he didn't trust the hearing to be independent.

I 100% believe City to be innocent but I'm not 100% confident City will be found innocent.

Perhaps that what he meant I can't believe the pl have gone this far without them getting a result. It doesn't make sense. I know these people are KC but I'm still not 100% confident
 
This is the problem. If we win, we won’t want to torch the Premier League to the ground because the main point of being a football club is .... Not mentioning any names of course but a certain lanky bald-headed streak of piss working for a club in North London may well be having sleepless nights. After all, I doubt our manager would go around naming names if there wasn’t something concrete behind it.
Who dis?
 
Perhaps he meant worried as in he didn't trust the hearing to be independent.

I 100% believe City to be innocent but I'm not 100% confident City will be found innocent.

Perhaps that what he meant I can't believe the pl have gone this far without them getting a result. It doesn't make sense. I know these people are KC but I'm still not 100% confident

Would’ve been very easy for him to say that then mate.

He just said he was worried.

He sounded like some old biddy being interviewed about the winter fuel allowance.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.