PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules


Bruce “won” but got hollowed out for the costs no?
That story is so old they are referring to them as Law Lords ffs!

Different rules for costs under the Civil Procedure Rules and Arbitration Act 1996 (which I think this hearing is subject to). The issue of proportionality not being relevant to the latter, for example.

Successful litigants can be liable for some or all of the costs if their conduct merits it, especially if they’ve rejected offers to settle which are more advantageous than what they win, but that won’t be the case here if we’re successful, as our defence will be founded on protecting our reputation and no settlement would satisfy that aspiration.
 
I hope City say we aren’t paying a share of legal costs for effectively prosecuting ourselves

And hopefully any club that wasn’t in the league at the time the charges were brought takes a leaf out of Leicester’s book and says they weren’t a PL club at the time so they aren’t either

Fanciful, but would be amusing
If we win and the PL clubs have to foot the bill, hopefully, the rest of the league will turn on the cartel when they realise they now have to pay for the cartel's campaign - a campaign that is purely in the cartel's self interest as they look to eliminate a commercial rival; they don't give a fuck about anyone else or "fair play".
 

Apparently we've already been charged and just being relegated and fined would be too lenient. The "other clubs" want relegation and a points deducted applied for multiple seasons so we can't compete. This a joke of a case and calling for multi season punishment just stinks of "other clubs" not wanting us spoiling their party.
That article is just made up click bait.
 
I think there’s a good chance that we’ll be awarded costs, or a decent proportion at least, if we win. The idea that we’re going to start suing all of our detractors is fanciful at best though, as you say.
I would imagine if as stated it is a truly independent panel and not filled with rags and dippers, if we are found not guilty they might award costs and possibly damages to our reputation
 
I’m not a fan of the idea that we go on the attack and try and sue clubs/people, claim damages etc. Just keep winning trophies and be top of the pile. That’s the best way to piss everyone off.
There are two or three clubs that I personally would want to run into the ground, but in general I agree.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.