PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

In my career in liability insurance I have been involved in dozens, if not hundreds of legal actions. The vast majority of these cases (probably upwards of 90%) settle before they get to court. In my experience this is down to two things. The first is the uncertainty of the outcome in a civil case and the second, and by far the biggest consideration, is the cost of litigation. It’s often much cheaper to settle a matter than have it proceed through the legal process to trial and possibly appeal.

So far, it doesn’t look like either side in this matter are thinking about the uncertainty or the cost.
That's because the PM don't give a shit if it cost the club's a few million each and the sheikh would sooner spend a billion on lawyers rather than give in to the twats.
 
Will a hearing like this have “leaks” as we go through the process of will it be a pretty tight ship on information until a decision has been made?
 
I hope if we have to fight fire with fire then we have enough kindling to build a massive bonfire to throw the prem onto . Compromising
Pictures, video tape, emails, letters the whole nine yards ! I actually don't want the prem destroyed, just the people and cartels running it . Sometimes you have to get your hands dirty and if we have to, let's throw that mud and have some start sticking to the prem and it's cronies .
 
It still astonishes me that they would want a re-run of the exact same charges that we won on at CAS. Why even go there? I know there’s a load of other stuff included but to effectively have a re-trial on something we were cleared of at the highest sporting arbitration court in the world smacks of desperation to me.
It's called envy and delusion.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.