I asked that question before and I don’t understand why city has to pay double legal fees to fuck us and not to fuck us .
Weird situation tbf
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Weird situation tbf
What proof do you have we were offered a deal, nobody knows. It's like make believe suddenly becoming reality.We’d have taken a deal if we weren’t 100% confident.
Maybe the settlement is about 'not cooporating' with investigation.A settlement would be an admission of wrong doing. We've said 'fuck that' for a very good reason and rightly so.
Keep the faith, Blues. Our guys have got this.
Are you inspector Clouseau ?What proof do you have we were offered a deal, nobody knows. It's like make believe suddenly becoming reality.
nothing but a shitty poker move by desperate masters and pl. Lord Pannick is not going to fall for his bluffMaybe the settlement is about 'not cooporating' with investigation.
marco
Well-Known Member
go back on the thread and read, please do keep up ;-)What proof do you have we were offered a deal, nobody knows. It's like make believe suddenly becoming reality.
We actually did,how have you come to the conclusion we didn't ?There was a program the other day where a an actual court case was actually re run with word for word from the transcript re run in front of two juries.
The two juries can to different conclusions.
My point is that even if the evidence is exactly the same different panels won’t necessarily reach the same decision then you have to factor in the different jurisdictions namely the PL rulebook and UEFas then CAS operates under Swiss Law and the PL under English Law
One final point is that surely it wasn’t that City proved to a comfortable satisfaction it was surely the fact that UEFa didn’t
This is what we have had to endure throughout this period, people like you ,who cannot or will not, read the judgment as written by the commission and then put their own interpretation on it.
Read the report,13 times the words no evidence was used in relation to the uefa chargeses.
Have done it's still a B rumour , with loads getting their knickers in a twist over it, whers is your proof?go back on the thread and read, please do keep up ;-)
Centurions
Well-Known Member
It's been confirmed by trusted people who do have contacts, if you want an actual video recording then dream on.Have done it's still a B rumour , with loads getting their knickers in a twist over it, whers is your proof?
Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 4,497
- Team supported
- City
Unless there are any confirmed and authenticated developments from Lord Pannick's chambers, perhaps more speculation/ guess work from esteemed posters is best avoided.What proof do you have we were offered a deal, nobody knows. It's like make believe suddenly becoming reality.
More time can then be spent observing the desperate writhing of the deluded ignoramus’s amongst our socially inadequate and cerebraly challenged detractors.
'We are Innocent Day' promises to be as memorable as any victory in our modern history.....different but very memorable !!