PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Cobwebcat said:
If you got £100 every time you said “banana” and £10 every time you said “orange” you would say banana all the time.

This is social media and increasing regular media.

That’s all it is. You won’t change it so try not to keep saying “OMG look what they have said now” that’s what they want. Look at the length of this thread for your answer.

Footy is very tribal and rival fans are desperate to see us found guilty. There are more rival fans than City fans. The media write what is popular not what is true. You must know this by now, why get triggered? All it does is feed them.

Do you think, even if we had never been charged, that rival fans would not bait us? We are the number one target because we win everything. It’s off the scale because we are accused of cheating. If Forest were the best team England had ever seen, they would be baited. It comes with the territory.

This is the World we live in and it’s shit.

It’s all bananas. It’s not meant to be fair any more.

Enjoy the verdict.
Click to expand...
No wonder this case is constipated with overdose of potassium
 
bennyboy said:
Best one yet so far is my mate said yous will have an asterisk beside everything we have won.
Replied back not an asterisk.You mental fuckers.That will sort us out.
Click to expand...
You should’ve said, i like that portable little **** but you can keep that fat **** obelix with you
 
Maly said:
It makes for amusing reading

Todays headlines include:
Pep made me cry & how Arteta freed me by Gabby Jesus
&
I managed City for one game & Pep was furious by Mikel Arteta

Tomorrow’s headlines ought to float your boat tho, as I believe they’re linking us with a January transfer of Tony Martial ;)
Click to expand...

Alternative headlines could have been:

It’s my 3rd season & I’ve still won fuck all by Gabby Jesus
Or
I had 100% losing record managing City by Mikel Arteta.
 
cheekybids said:
Alternative headlines could have been:

It’s my 3rd season & I’ve still won fuck all by Gabby Jesus
Or
I had 100% losing record managing City by Mikel Arteta.
Click to expand...
Arteta- I’m also a lead singer in a band called “Lego Head “
 
halfcenturyup said:
For those who don't want to click.

Loading…

archive.ph

Surprisingly balanced for Ronay, but while one or two in the press have begun considering the possibility the allegations may not be proven, none of them are considering the huge obstacles in front of the PL if they want to prove their allegations, or the consequences for the people in the PL if they can't land a serious charge for their 30 million investment, in fact 40-50 million by the time they have paid some of City's costs. They are still peddling the "the emails are convincing" argument of the Magic Harris Hat which has minimal legal weight.

Anyway, there is that. And the fact that City is now an "arm of an influential nation state", apparently. I suppose it's better than state-owned, state-funded, state-supported and the rest but I have no idea what it means in the real world.
Click to expand...
Most people reading it won’t know the issues relating to our sponsorships and that the fair value of the Etihad contract has never been challenged. So from Ronay’s article they would be led to believe that funds were being found to top up the Etihad agreement rather than pay part of it, thus giving us more revenue than we were declaring. Ronay doesn’t actually claim that the extra funds came from our owner, but fails to point out that, if that is the case, we haven’t been disguising equity as sponsorship and haven’t broken any rules.
 
Norbiton said:
Most people reading it won’t know the issues relating to our sponsorships and that the fair value of the Etihad contract has never been challenged. So from Ronay’s article they would be led to believe that funds were being found to top up the Etihad agreement rather than pay part of it, thus giving us more revenue than we were declaring. Ronay doesn’t actually claim that the extra funds came from our owner, but fails to point out that, if that is the case, we haven’t been disguising equity as sponsorship and haven’t broken any rules.
Click to expand...
I haven't read / won't be reading the article but I would imagine he has deliberately left that open ended so the readers draw their own conclusion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.