halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,072
Agreed, with the proviso that nobody can ever be sure of any outcome. It's certainly an uphill battle for the PL, though. And we know how they usually end.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Agreed, with the proviso that nobody can ever be sure of any outcome. It's certainly an uphill battle for the PL, though. And we know how they usually end.
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
We’re owned by Etihad? News to me and everyone else in here I expect.
you know that's not what i meant.
Do you honestly think that any blue thinks we're owned by Etihad? when i said "we're owned and sponsored. they're just sponsored." i was obviously referring to the UAE. i clearly meant that our ownership and main sponsors originate in the UAE whereas with Arsenal its only their sponsors that are from the UAE.
i doubt anyone else failed to get that.
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
thats a good point, whilst rwanda has rebuilt itself to an extent it is still listed in the top 10 worst countries for human rights."Genocide washing" I believe is much more of a disgusting Money grubbing exercise than any alleged sportswashing bullshit. Strange the press or media morons never mention it.
this point is probably best used as a response to any arsenal fan that references sportswashing
I’ve been very confident about the outcome up to now but just heard some Scouse “comedian” say as we’ve been charged with 115 charges we must be guilty of some and the other teams should stop playing us!
Was great whilst it lasted.
Was great whilst it lasted.
EastStandLower
Well-Known Member
Perhaps they should all refuse to play LFC as their shirts advertise a company that has been found guilty of laundering money for terrorists organisations?I’ve been very confident about the outcome up to now but just heard some Scouse “comedian” say as we’ve been charged with 115 charges we must be guilty of some and the other teams should stop playing us!
Was great whilst it lasted.
LeonardoDaVnci
Well-Known Member
Week 4 of the Trial of the Century.
Let's imagine the scene in one of those plush suites inside the NDRC. We have PL Lawyer speaking and Panel Member.
PL Lawyer: May I refer the panel to Item 1, the alleged email from Mr Pearce on the 1 April 2012.
Panel Member: Is this the item you referred us to 12 times in week 1,18 times in week 2 and 28 times in week 3 ?
PL Lawyer: Yes, correct Mr Pearce's alleged email.
Panel Member: In relation to what charge is this concerning?
PL Lawyer: This is in relation to the grass cutting non compliance charge for 2013-2014.
Panel Member: How ?
PL Lawyer: Let's not get too bogged down with any specifics of the email, as we believe it illustrates the malevolent disregard for the PL rules that permeated the executives of MCFC. An attitude of contempt for the rules which led to a complete disregard of the grass cutting regulations.
Panel Member: Oh Christ Almighty, not again, what time is Lunch ?
Let's imagine the scene in one of those plush suites inside the NDRC. We have PL Lawyer speaking and Panel Member.
PL Lawyer: May I refer the panel to Item 1, the alleged email from Mr Pearce on the 1 April 2012.
Panel Member: Is this the item you referred us to 12 times in week 1,18 times in week 2 and 28 times in week 3 ?
PL Lawyer: Yes, correct Mr Pearce's alleged email.
Panel Member: In relation to what charge is this concerning?
PL Lawyer: This is in relation to the grass cutting non compliance charge for 2013-2014.
Panel Member: How ?
PL Lawyer: Let's not get too bogged down with any specifics of the email, as we believe it illustrates the malevolent disregard for the PL rules that permeated the executives of MCFC. An attitude of contempt for the rules which led to a complete disregard of the grass cutting regulations.
Panel Member: Oh Christ Almighty, not again, what time is Lunch ?
Last edited:
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,896
I wonder what his views on prejudicial lies in the media about Hillsborough are.I’ve been very confident about the outcome up to now but just heard some Scouse “comedian” say as we’ve been charged with 115 charges we must be guilty of some and the other teams should stop playing us!
Was great whilst it lasted.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
I really hope the people of Manchester boycott John Bishop’s gigs after his poisonous tirade against City on TalkSPORT today. His comments saying clubs and rival fans should boycott games against City were despicable, especially as he lives in Manchester. His claim that: “There are 115 charges so we must have done something” showed him to be a total moron. It’s always funny when the mask slips from people like him.I’ve been very confident about the outcome up to now but just heard some Scouse “comedian” say as we’ve been charged with 115 charges we must be guilty of some and the other teams should stop playing us!
Was great whilst it lasted.
LeonardoDaVnci
Well-Known Member
And when LFC caused EVERY English club to be banned by UEFA for 5 years, because of Heysel, did the other clubs stop playing them ? Or did they ask them for compensation ?. Never let a dipper try to adopt the moral high ground...I wonder what his views on prejudicial lies in the media about Hillsborough are.
Matt Diablo
Well-Known Member
What a scouse twat. Saw him at O2 once. Won't be againI really hope the people of Manchester boycott John Bishop’s gigs after his poisonous tirade against City on TalkSPORT today. His comments saying clubs and rival fans should boycott games against City were despicable, especially as he lives in Manchester. His claim that: “There are 115 charges so we must have done something” showed him to be a total moron. It’s always funny when the mask slips from people like him.