birchwoodgingerste
Well-Known Member
So is the white paper thing that's coming g out the superleague been agreed between fa interested parties a golden handshake.takes the heat away from fa interesting if true.
Bulls eye!Bellingham won't be signing for a team lower than mid table.
Was said with a tinge of this :)Not a fucking chance mate , too many players heads have fallen off , our reputation is far more important than that shower of shit of a competition.
Sopcast was our friend then and can be again...But we will get a stream for the aways ?
The emails were correct but not necessarily in the right order.So we admitted the emails were correct but they found us not guilty? Job done.
It was due tomorrow but has been delayed 2 weeks now funnily enough.So is the white paper thing that's coming g out the superleague been agreed between fa interested parties a golden handshake.takes the heat away from fa interesting if true.
Surely this failure means you win?
They've breached an agreement as this implies they don't have these expert reports.
What's your solicitor said?
I've long said he won't come here anyway, so I'm not arsed with that argument.Or one with the threat of point’s reduction either
Not a problem mate tbh , but you know aswell as i do that this will run for years, simple question mate , if you were Bellingham as an example ,would you sign for us in the close season ?
Haha kinell, that escalated quicklyWhat is painfully clear from this thread is that the vast majority have never had any dealings with the dibble, tax authorities, regulators etc and assume charges are equivalent to guilt
I’ve had dealings with all three, many times, spurious and vexatious allegations each time. I’ve run fucking rings around them every time when it came to a substantive hearing and I could calmly probe my innocence. These people aren’t really that bright and are as susceptible to bias and external pressure as anyone else
And I’m just a nobody from a shithole like Longsight. Imagine what someone like Khaldoon has access to?
For all those wet wipes who think just because we have been charged we must be guilty, I would suggest you don’t post on this thread again until you grow a bit of hair on your balls
Needs to send one of his assistants instead ;-)Pep's pre match press conference will be fun on Friday. That wank stain Stone won't be able to contain himself.
...and what can they see?
The club statement specifically mentioned “the extensive engagement and vast amount of detailed materials that the EPL has been provided with”, which suggests that we feel that we have co-operated.I think part of the issue here is that City have refused to cooperate again
I do think the statute of limitations of 6 years would apply however i think the fact that the premier league are using non cooperation as a way to appear to try and circumvent that because obviously there is exceptions to the limitations act. the issue i have with the premier league in s32 of the act says the limitation period doesnt begin until the fraud is discovered …or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. Can someone explain to me how the amount of times our accounts are scruitinised whether it be by uefa premier league, accountants, hmrc not one of them discovered a fraud in 9 years. I smell some bull expiray nonsence being the outcome.
I have full faith in the club to be cleared of these charges personally as the premier league with have to have evidence of a really high level to win with these charges and to be quite frank i dont think they have that. i think they have underestimate the amount of issues this is going to cause them their own arbitration isnt even set up for this magnitude of case.