PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

What a way to bow out of the charges, So it will be something like- Manchester city escape punisment due to Government presure, its realy going to boil the piss with the red tops
 
Kippax Street 1880 said:
They know exactly what they are doing. Crafting the narrative City were exonerated due to external pressure from the Government due to the Abu Dhabi investment in the UK. 2 weeks after we are cleared this will be classed as established fact and all the usual suspects will carry on freely defaming our club in the press.
Click to expand...
That‘s as good a conspiracy theory as any.

It doesn’t really matter if we are guilty or not. Everybody knows it already.
 
Kippax Street 1880 said:
They know exactly what they are doing. Crafting the narrative City were exonerated due to external pressure from the Government due to the Abu Dhabi investment in the UK. 2 weeks after we are cleared this will be classed as established fact and all the usual suspects will carry on freely defaming our club in the press.
Click to expand...
Nail on the head. This whole saga has always been about smearing City and damaging our reputation. I don't believe for one minute that UEFA had any evidence of wrongdoing by City and I have come to the conclusion that neither does the PL. This story is another selective leak to the sycophants in the media and it does smell so much like the leaks of false information from UEFA before the CAS appeal decision.
 
Rammy Blue said:
Unless I’m missing something @The Shallyman quite clearly states he’s a LFC fan so not sure why people keep calling him a rag?
Click to expand...

This is why they should have in brackets who they support! Because I read his/her posts and understand why they thinking that way! It's in built bias rivalry wishful thinking hoping we done something wrong! Oh his opinion for me on here stands for nought because of inbuilt bias!
 
give it to gordon said:
The American owned clubs along with the British press/media have brain washed those fans.
I know it cant be true ( lol ) but are these fans really that naive to think this wouldnt get discussed at a high level ?

As others have pointed out a British business ( PL ) run by Americans has accused a member of AD of being a crook.

Our top people are also very high up in AD dealing in multi billion deals around the world with different countries.

The American run PL has decided to try and ruin these people good name within the multi billion world they operate in.

I would have thought AD would have had discussions about this with many different countries. Most countries wouldnt want to do business with AD if they cook the books.

This is far bigger than those knobheads at the PL understood.

Football is tribal and it seems alot of rival fans are blind to the officious. Do they think that the prince of AD is a crook.

American owners are a huge threat to our football and it needs stopping.

Why dont the press/media ask questions when at club sponsored by Emirates win the cup also sponsored by Emirates ? Remember the dodge semi final when City were screwed over so arsenal got to the final.
Click to expand...

They get 14 American owners in premier they can vote to kick us out the league if they wanted to, on the lies Narrative that been reported in the media last 10/12 years!
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
The PL have accused our owner, one of the biggest investors in the UK who helped bail out our banks, of committing fraud. He is also a leading member of a Government which is one of our biggest trade partners and one of our biggest aliies in the gulf region (especially in the fight against Islamist terrorism).
At the same time the key players running the PL (Richard Masters and his pals at LFC and MUFC who vetted his appointment) have launched a politically-motivated investigfation into our finances going back to 2008. After four years they chose not to sanction us (presumably because of lack of evidence) so they have passed the buck to a so-called independent panel.
Meanwhile our Government (with all-party support) is pushing for an independent regulator because it believes the people in charge of the PL are unethical and can't be trusted. City are the only club (as far as we know) supporting independent regulation. Why wouldn't the Government be interested in all these issues?
Click to expand...

Well, exactly!
 
It looks like We are at a stage where it doesn't matter what we do to clear this shit up, they are going to continue to muddy the waters and continue with the agenda
To this I say fuck em, we are never going to get the credit the club and team deserve, and at the end of the day who really gives a shit what some thick twat red shirt with a Sky remote for a season ticket or an agenda driven hack really thinks, I know I don't,

they really don't get it that no self respecting City fan gives 2 shiny shits about what they think about the best run club in the world

May the piss boiling continue for a long time, it has galvanised the club, the fan base and particularly Pep and the players the dummies don't realise they are the fuel feeding Pep, the more they diminish him the more determined he is to ram it down their throats

For this alone I don't want City to be a media darling, it's our club and fuck everyone else
 
Skip Donoghue said:
It looks like We are at a stage where it doesn't matter what we do to clear this shit up, they are going to continue to muddy the waters and continue with the agenda
To this I say fuck em, we are never going to get the credit the club and team deserve, and at the end of the day who really gives a shit what some thick twat red shirt with a Sky remote for a season ticket or an agenda driven hack really thinks, I know I don't,

they really don't get it that no self respecting City fan gives 2 shiny shits about what they think about the best run club in the world

May the piss boiling continue for a long time, it has galvanised the club, the fan base and particularly Pep and the players the dummies don't realise they are the fuel feeding Pep, the more they diminish him the more determined he is to ram it down their throats

For this alone I don't want City to be a media darling, it's our club and fuck everyone else
Click to expand...
And by the amount of overseas supporters that we are attracting to the club, it would appear that they too,don't give 2 shiny shirts about the the trumped up chargeses.
Onwards and upwards, "feck em all"
 
Mubadala gave Silver Lake £2b before they ‘invested’ £500m in us so why don’t we just wire them the value of the club to change the ownership on paper to avoid any liability?

The racist prejudice will never stop while we are owned by his highness
 
bluenova said:
There seems to be a lot of confusion about this, and it doesn't help that most people who've read and commented in the Athletic are confused too.

This is the headline on the front page of The Athletic:

Man City's Premier League charges discussed by UK government and Abu Dhabi

This shortened version is wrong, and seems to have caused confusion, as the actual story has the following headline:

Manchester City’s Premier League charges discussed by UK government and its embassy in Abu Dhabi

As the story is mostly filler because they didn't find out anything beyond this headline, a lot of people have read it and are STILL confused.

All we know is that the UK government spoke to the UK embassy. Given that The Athletic were interested enough to put in a freedom of Information request, it's almost certain that journalists have been contacting the embassy, so this could literally be someone reporting back "we've been contacted by a journalist and have said we don't know anything".

It might be more, but nobody who isn't involved knows.
Click to expand...
The Athletic inquiry smacks of the old political dredging tactic of asking a representative of an official if the official has considered a particular topic, being told “I am not aware if they have considered it”, and then asking said representative to ask the official if they have considered it, at which point they will have considered it, opening a new line of questioning.
 
Disco Danger said:
Mubadala gave Silver Lake £2b before they ‘invested’ £500m in us so why don’t we just wire them the value of the club to change the ownership on paper to avoid any liability?

The racist prejudice will never stop while we are owned by his highness
Click to expand...

IMG-0352.jpg


IMG-0353.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top