Wow dave ! really ? are saying what pep and his team has transformed the face of pl as a brand, as a football club and how pep revamped the boring english hoof ball , means nothing ?Why would it?
A season without City would generate big interest.
City fighting their way back would generate big interest.
As long as exciting things are happening, which they always are, the premier league will remain massively attractive to viewers and advertisers.
Where can I see or hear his comments ? Who has he spoken with ?Neville coming out attacking the Premier League in all this explains that someone has actually sat down with him who is clued up on the City side of things to make the penny drop. He had this stance during the shit with Uefa, he wants to be seen as the cleverest person in the room.
Is it possible therefore that the respected KCs on the Panel could find us not guilty of anything shall we say serious but just guilty of non compliance and incorrect grass cutting. However their penalty for these minor offences could in fact trigger a much greater fine / points deduction / etc.?I disagree about the prem; they are reacting to a continuous PR campaign by the redshirts who also pressure them with demands for action against us. The redshirts are the real enemy, the prem is their lapdog.
Exactly.It’s not just titles it’s relegation and placing prize money clubs would argue regarding points win and lost against us
The effects this had on the above #toocomplex
Now that is what I call cheating.Investing too much money in a club can't be compared with the match-fixing scandals which led to trophies being taken off clubs in Italy. It would be ridiculous.
The PL used to be happy with 3 red shirt clubs winning the PL title every season, bar Liverpool. The PL were happy for Chelsea, a London team, to.join the party. When City turned up that started alarm bells ringing at the PL.There's 6 big global teams in the PL.
City, Liverpool, Arsenal, United, Spurs, Chelsea.
Newcastle aren't there yet. 6 teams have huge global interest, that's it. 1 of these 6 teams has the best team in the world, with the best striker in the world and the best manager. The PL wants to kill it off? Having 6 'big' teams makes the PL what it is, and better than every other competition. Six 'big' teams gives the PL the tv deal it has.
City are only dominant cause they are doing nearly everything right on and off the pitch, it wont last forever. Once Pep leaves, a noticeable drop will happen.The PL used to be happy with 3 red shirt clubs winning the PL title every season, bar Liverpool. The PL were happy for Chelsea, a London team, to.join the party. When City turned up that started alarm bells ringing at the PL.
I didn’t say it means nothing. I said that the premier league is not “finished” if City are relegated. There is a world of difference between those two positions.Wow dave ! really ? are saying what pep and his team has transformed the face of pl as a brand, as a football club and how pep revamped the boring english hoof ball , means nothing ?
Come on man you are better then this.
If the tribunal is independent, the punishment must be decided in a non partisan way. I guess it would be up to the chairman whether he accepted argument from the PL as to punishment, together with any rebuttal by City. Certainly what should not happen is that PL figures shout from the sidelines. If the PL is given standing to ask for a particular punishment that must be in argument before the tribunal not from outside and the respondent must be allowed to enter a plea in mitigation.Is it possible therefore that the respected KCs on the Panel could find us not guilty of anything shall we say serious but just guilty of non compliance and incorrect grass cutting. However their penalty for these minor offences could in fact trigger a much greater fine / points deduction / etc.?
In other words the KCs do it correctly but the penalty is what the PL want?